mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Prediction and Uncertainty Quantification of SAFARI-1 Axial Neutron Flux Profiles with Neural Networks

arXiv 2211.08654 ↗First posted 16 Nov 2022stat.ML cs.LG physics.comp-phcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) have been successfully used in various nuclear engineering applications, such as predicting reactor physics parameters within reasonable time and with a high level of accuracy. Despite this success, they cannot provide information about the model prediction uncertainties, making it difficult to assess ANN prediction credibility, especially in extrapolated domains. In this study, Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) are used to predict the assembly axial neutron flux profiles in the SAFARI-1 research reactor, with quantified uncertainties in the ANN predictions and extrapolation to cycles not used in the training process. The training dataset consists of copper-wire activation measurements, the axial measurement locations and the measured control bank positions obtained from the reactor's historical cycles. Uncertainty Quantification of the regular DNN models' predictions is performed using Monte Carlo Dropout (MCD) and Bayesian Neural Networks solved by Variational Inference (BNN VI). The regular DNNs, DNNs solved with MCD and BNN VI results agree very well among each other as well as with the new measured dataset not used in the training process, thus indicating good prediction and generalization capability. The uncertainty bands produced by MCD and BNN VI agree very well, and in general, they can fully envelop the noisy measurement data points. The developed ANNs are useful in supporting the experimental measurements campaign and neutronics code Verification and Validation (V&V).

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Nov 2022.

Builds on

5 of 47 references.

References · 5

  1. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  2. 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,466
  3. 2020Bayesian Neural Networks: An Introduction and Surveycited by 130
  4. 2019A Review of Deep Learning with Special Emphasis on Architectures, Applications and Recent Trendscited by 26
  5. 2018Data-driven modeling for boiling heat transfer: using deep neural networks and high-fidelity simulation resultscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

6 papers.