mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The rate of convergence of Bregman proximal methods: Local geometry vs. regularity vs. sharpness

arXiv 2211.08043 ↗First posted 15 Nov 2022math.OC cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We examine the last-iterate convergence rate of Bregman proximal methods - from mirror descent to mirror-prox and its optimistic variants - as a function of the local geometry induced by the prox-mapping defining the method. For generality, we focus on local solutions of constrained, non-monotone variational inequalities, and we show that the convergence rate of a given method depends sharply on its associated Legendre exponent, a notion that measures the growth rate of the underlying Bregman function (Euclidean, entropic, or other) near a solution. In particular, we show that boundary solutions exhibit a stark separation of regimes between methods with a zero and non-zero Legendre exponent: the former converge at a linear rate, while the latter converge, in general, sublinearly. This dichotomy becomes even more pronounced in linearly constrained problems where methods with entropic regularization achieve a linear convergence rate along sharp directions, compared to convergence in a finite number of steps under Euclidean regularization.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2022.

Builds on

2 of 15 references.

References · 2

  1. 2014Convex Optimization: Algorithms and Complexitycited by 569
  2. 2016Learning in games with continuous action sets and unknown payoff functionscited by 78

Built on by

Not cited yet.