mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Interpreting Bias in the Neural Networks: A Peek Into Representational Similarity

arXiv 2211.07774 ↗First posted 14 Nov 2022cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural networks trained on standard image classification data sets are shown to be less resistant to data set bias. It is necessary to comprehend the behavior objective function that might correspond to superior performance for data with biases. However, there is little research on the selection of the objective function and its representational structure when trained on data set with biases. In this paper, we investigate the performance and internal representational structure of convolution-based neural networks (e.g., ResNets) trained on biased data using various objective functions. We specifically study similarities in representations, using Centered Kernel Alignment (CKA), for different objective functions (probabilistic and margin-based) and offer a comprehensive analysis of the chosen ones. According to our findings, ResNets representations obtained with Negative Log Likelihood (LNLL) and Softmax Cross-Entropy (LSCE) as loss functions are equally capable of producing better performance and fine representations on biased data. We note that without progressive representational similarities among the layers of a neural network, the performance is less likely to be robust.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2022.

Builds on

16 of 24 references.

References · 16

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
  3. 2016InfoGAN: Interpretable Representation Learning by Information Maximizing Generative Adversarial Netscited by 860
  4. 2020Are we done with ImageNet?cited by 333
  5. 2018Insights on representational similarity in neural networks with canonical correlationcited by 324
  6. 2018Learning Not to Learn: Training Deep Neural Networks with Biased Datacited by 255
  7. 2020Do Wide and Deep Networks Learn the Same Things? Uncovering How Neural Network Representations Vary with Width and Depthcited by 245
  8. 2019REPAIR: Removing Representation Bias by Dataset Resamplingcited by 157
  9. 2020Evaluation of Neural Architectures Trained with Square Loss vs Cross-Entropy in Classification Taskscited by 138
  10. 2021Learning Debiased Representation via Disentangled Feature Augmentationcited by 116
  11. 2020Image Representations Learned With Unsupervised Pre-Training Contain Human-like Biasescited by 107
  12. 2020Why Do Better Loss Functions Lead to Less Transferable Features?cited by 73
4 more
  1. 2017On Loss Functions for Deep Neural Networks in Classificationcited by 68
  2. 2021Stochastic Bias-Reduced Gradient Methodscited by 25
  3. 2022On the Versatile Uses of Partial Distance Correlation in Deep Learningcited by 19
  4. 2022Interpretability of artificial neural network models in artificial Intelligence vs. neurosciencecited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.