REVEL Framework to measure Local Linear Explanations for black-box models: Deep Learning Image Classification case of study
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Explainable artificial intelligence is proposed to provide explanations for reasoning performed by an Artificial Intelligence. There is no consensus on how to evaluate the quality of these explanations, since even the definition of explanation itself is not clear in the literature. In particular, for the widely known Local Linear Explanations, there are qualitative proposals for the evaluation of explanations, although they suffer from theoretical inconsistencies. The case of image is even more problematic, where a visual explanation seems to explain a decision while detecting edges is what it really does. There are a large number of metrics in the literature specialized in quantitatively measuring different qualitative aspects so we should be able to develop metrics capable of measuring in a robust and correct way the desirable aspects of the explanations. In this paper, we propose a procedure called REVEL to evaluate different aspects concerning the quality of explanations with a theoretically coherent development. This procedure has several advances in the state of the art: it standardizes the concepts of explanation and develops a series of metrics not only to be able to compare between them but also to obtain absolute information regarding the explanation itself. The experiments have been carried out on image four datasets as benchmark where we show REVEL's descriptive and analytical power.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Nov 2022.
Builds on
11 of 24 references.
References · 11
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
- 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
- 2018Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 508
- 2020Reliable Post hoc Explanations: Modeling Uncertainty in Explainabilitycited by 125
- 2021To trust or not to trust an explanation: using LEAF to evaluate local linear XAI methodscited by 26
- 2019Effect of Superpixel Aggregation on Explanations in LIME -- A Case Study with Biological Datacited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 3.
5 papers.
- 2023Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) 2.0: A Manifesto of Open Challenges and Interdisciplinary Research Directionscited by 123
- 2023Connecting the Dots in Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: From AI Principles, Ethics, and Key Requirements to Responsible AI Systems and Regulationcited by 60
- 2024Using Stratified Sampling to Improve LIME Image Explanationscited by 3
- 2024X-SHIELD: Regularization for eXplainable Artificial Intelligencecited by 3
- 2024RAB2-DEF: Dynamic and explainable defense against adversarial attacks in Federated Learning to fair poor clientscited by 0
- 2024RAB2-DEF: Dynamic and explainable defense against adversarial attacks in Federated Learning to fair poor clients10 Oct 2024
- 2024X-SHIELD: Regularization for eXplainable Artificial Intelligence3 Apr 2024
- 2024Using Stratified Sampling to Improve LIME Image Explanations26 Mar 2024
- 2023Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) 2.0: A Manifesto of Open Challenges and Interdisciplinary Research Directions30 Oct 2023
- 2023Connecting the Dots in Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: From AI Principles, Ethics, and Key Requirements to Responsible AI Systems and Regulation2 May 2023