mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Impact of Video Compression on the Performance of Object Detection Systems for Surveillance Applications

arXiv 2211.05805 ↗First posted 10 Nov 2022cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This study examines the relationship between H.264 video compression and the performance of an object detection network (YOLOv5). We curated a set of 50 surveillance videos and annotated targets of interest (people, bikes, and vehicles). Videos were encoded at 5 quality levels using Constant Rate Factor (CRF) values in the set {22,32,37,42,47}. YOLOv5 was applied to compressed videos and detection performance was analyzed at each CRF level. Test results indicate that the detection performance is generally robust to moderate levels of compression; using a CRF value of 37 instead of 22 leads to significantly reduced bitrates/file sizes without adversely affecting detection performance. However, detection performance degrades appreciably at higher compression levels, especially in complex scenes with poor lighting and fast-moving targets. Finally, retraining YOLOv5 on compressed imagery gives up to a 1% improvement in F1 score when applied to highly compressed footage.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Nov 2022.

Builds on

4 of 13 references.

References · 4

  1. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  2. 2016Understanding How Image Quality Affects Deep Neural Networkscited by 118
  3. 2018Effects of Degradations on Deep Neural Network Architecturescited by 47
  4. 2020On the Impact of Lossy Image and Video Compression on the Performance of Deep Convolutional Neural Network Architecturescited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.