mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Streaming Euclidean Max-Cut: Dimension vs Data Reduction

arXiv 2211.05293 ↗First posted 10 Nov 2022cs.DScited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Max-Cut is a fundamental problem that has been studied extensively in various settings. We design an algorithm for Euclidean Max-Cut, where the input is a set of points in ℝd, in the model of dynamic geometric streams, where the input Xsubseteq [Delta]d is presented as a sequence of point insertions and deletions. Previously, Frahling and Sohler [STOC 2005] designed a (1+ε)-approximation algorithm for the low-dimensional regime, i.e., it uses space exp(d). To tackle this problem in the high-dimensional regime, which is of growing interest, one must improve the dependence on the dimension d, ideally to space complexity poly(ε-1 d logDelta). Lammersen, Sidiropoulos, and Sohler [WADS 2009] proved that Euclidean Max-Cut admits dimension reduction with target dimension d' = poly(ε-1). Combining this with the aforementioned algorithm that uses space exp(d'), they obtain an algorithm whose overall space complexity is indeed polynomial in d, but unfortunately exponential in ε-1. We devise an alternative approach of data reduction, based on importance sampling, and achieve space bound poly(ε-1 d logDelta), which is exponentially better (in ε) than the dimension-reduction approach. To implement this scheme in the streaming model, we employ a randomly-shifted quadtree to construct a tree embedding. While this is a well-known method, a key feature of our algorithm is that the embedding's distortion O(dlogDelta) affects only the space complexity, and the approximation ratio remains 1+ε.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Nov 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.