GENIUS: A Novel Solution for Subteam Replacement with Clustering-based Graph Neural Network
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Subteam replacement is defined as finding the optimal candidate set of people who can best function as an unavailable subset of members (i.e., subteam) for certain reasons (e.g., conflicts of interests, employee churn), given a team of people embedded in a social network working on the same task. Prior investigations on this problem incorporate graph kernel as the optimal criteria for measuring the similarity between the new optimized team and the original team. However, the increasingly abundant social networks reveal fundamental limitations of existing methods, including (1) the graph kernel-based approaches are powerless to capture the key intrinsic correlations among node features, (2) they generally search over the entire network for every member to be replaced, making it extremely inefficient as the network grows, and (3) the requirement of equal-sized replacement for the unavailable subteam can be inapplicable due to limited hiring budget. In this work, we address the limitations in the state-of-the-art for subteam replacement by (1) proposing GENIUS, a novel clustering-based graph neural network (GNN) framework that can capture team network knowledge for flexible subteam replacement, and (2) equipping the proposed GENIUS with self-supervised positive team contrasting training scheme to improve the team-level representation learning and unsupervised node clusters to prune candidates for fast computation. Through extensive empirical evaluations, we demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed method (1) effectiveness: being able to select better candidate members that significantly increase the similarity between the optimized and original teams, and (2) efficiency: achieving more than 600 times speed-up in average running time.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Nov 2022.
Builds on
22 of 42 references.
References · 22
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
- 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,460
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
- 2018Pitfalls of Graph Neural Network Evaluationcited by 994
- 2016Revisiting Semi-Supervised Learning with Graph Embeddingscited by 970
- 2018Representation Learning on Graphs with Jumping Knowledge Networkscited by 875
- 2018Hierarchical Graph Representation Learning with Differentiable Poolingcited by 786
- 2020Adaptive Universal Generalized PageRank Graph Neural Networkcited by 592
- 2019Measuring and Relieving the Over-smoothing Problem for Graph Neural Networks from the Topological Viewcited by 544
10 more
- 2019Self-Attention Graph Poolingcited by 421
- 2017Deep Gaussian Embedding of Graphs: Unsupervised Inductive Learning via Rankingcited by 332
- 2020MAGNN: Metapath Aggregated Graph Neural Network for Heterogeneous Graph Embeddingcited by 304
- 2021A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Anomaly Detection with Deep Learningcited by 230
- 2020Graph Clustering with Graph Neural Networkscited by 163
- 2021Few-shot Network Anomaly Detection via Cross-network Meta-learningcited by 64
- 2018GraKeL: A Graph Kernel Library in Pythoncited by 54
- 2014Replacing the Irreplaceable: Fast Algorithms for Team Member Recommendationcited by 2
- 2021REFORM: Fast and Adaptive Solution for Subteam Replacementcited by 2
- 2018EXTRA: Explaining Team Recommendation in Networkscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
2 papers.