mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Metricizing the Euclidean Space towards Desired Distance Relations in Point Clouds

arXiv 2211.03674 ↗First posted 7 Nov 2022cs.CG cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Given a set of points in the Euclidean space ℝℓ with ℓ>1, the pairwise distances between the points are determined by their spatial location and the metric d that we endow ℝℓ with. Hence, the distance d(mathbf x,mathbf y)=δ between two points is fixed by the choice of mathbf x and mathbf y and d. We study the related problem of fixing the value δ, and the points mathbf x,mathbf y, and ask if there is a topological metric d that computes the desired distance δ. We demonstrate this problem to be solvable by constructing a metric to simultaneously give desired pairwise distances between up to O(√ℓ) many points in ℝℓ. We then introduce the notion of an varepsilon-semimetric tilded to formulate our main result: for all varepsilon>0, for all m≥ 1, for any choice of m points mathbf y1,ldots,mathbf ym∈ℝℓ, and all chosen sets of values δij≥ 0: 1≤ i<j≤ m, there exists an varepsilon-semimetric tildeδ:ℝℓ× ℝℓ→ℝ such that tilded(mathbf yi,mathbf yj)=δij, i.e., the desired distances are accomplished, irrespectively of the topology that the Euclidean or other norms would induce. We showcase our results by using them to attack unsupervised learning algorithms, specifically k-Means and density-based (DBSCAN) clustering algorithms. These have manifold applications in artificial intelligence, and letting them run with externally provided distance measures constructed in the way as shown here, can make clustering algorithms produce results that are pre-determined and hence malleable. This demonstrates that the results of clustering algorithms may not generally be trustworthy, unless there is a standardized and fixed prescription to use a specific distance function.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Nov 2022.

Builds on

15 of 65 references.

References · 15

  1. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  2. 2017Adversarial Examples: Attacks and Defenses for Deep Learningcited by 351
  3. 2019The Unfairness of Popularity Bias in Recommendationcited by 70
  4. 2021Cross-Domain Adaptive Clustering for Semi-Supervised Domain Adaptationcited by 67
  5. 2020Factors Influencing Perceived Fairness in Algorithmic Decision-Making: Algorithm Outcomes, Development Procedures, and Individual Differencescited by 41
  6. 2021Societal Biases in Retrieved Contents: Measurement Framework and Adversarial Mitigation for BERT Rankerscited by 35
  7. 2018Is Data Clustering in Adversarial Settings Secure?cited by 18
  8. 2020A black-box adversarial attack for poisoning clusteringcited by 16
  9. 2018Hierarchical Clustering with Structural Constraintscited by 15
  10. 2017Practical Attacks Against Graph-based Clusteringcited by 9
  11. 2020Using Single-Step Adversarial Training to Defend Iterative Adversarial Examplescited by 9
  12. 2021Imperceptible Adversarial Examples by Spatial Chroma-Shiftcited by 7
3 more
  1. 2021Statistically-Robust Clustering Techniques for Mapping Spatial Hotspots: A Surveycited by 3
  2. 2021Frequency Centric Defense Mechanisms against Adversarial Examplescited by 3
  3. 2018A Grid Based Adversarial Clustering Algorithmcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

3 papers.