mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Privacy-Preserving Models for Legal Natural Language Processing

arXiv 2211.02956 ↗First posted 5 Nov 2022cs.CLcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Pre-training large transformer models with in-domain data improves domain adaptation and helps gain performance on the domain-specific downstream tasks. However, sharing models pre-trained on potentially sensitive data is prone to adversarial privacy attacks. In this paper, we asked to which extent we can guarantee privacy of pre-training data and, at the same time, achieve better downstream performance on legal tasks without the need of additional labeled data. We extensively experiment with scalable self-supervised learning of transformer models under the formal paradigm of differential privacy and show that under specific training configurations we can improve downstream performance without sacrifying privacy protection for the in-domain data. Our main contribution is utilizing differential privacy for large-scale pre-training of transformer language models in the legal NLP domain, which, to the best of our knowledge, has not been addressed before.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2022.

Builds on

26 of 40 references.

References · 26

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  4. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
  5. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  6. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
  7. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
  8. 2016Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translationcited by 1,475
  9. 2020A Primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT workscited by 815
  10. 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 650
  11. 2021Opacus: User-Friendly Differential Privacy Library in PyTorchcited by 383
  12. 2019R'enyi Differential Privacy of the Sampled Gaussian Mechanismcited by 204
14 more
  1. 2021When Does Pretraining Help? Assessing Self-Supervised Learning for Law and the CaseHOLD Datasetcited by 201
  2. 2021Large-Scale Differentially Private BERTcited by 118
  3. 2022The Text Anonymization Benchmark (TAB): A Dedicated Corpus and Evaluation Framework for Text Anonymizationcited by 95
  4. 2013Fingerprinting Codes and the Price of Approximate Differential Privacycited by 82
  5. 2019Differentially Private Model Publishing for Deep Learningcited by 71
  6. 2014Private Learning and Sanitization: Pure vs. Approximate Differential Privacycited by 63
  7. 2020Enabling Fast Differentially Private SGD via Just-in-Time Compilation and Vectorizationcited by 58
  8. 2015Between Pure and Approximate Differential Privacycited by 56
  9. 2022Mining Legal Arguments in Court Decisionscited by 35
  10. 2022DP-Rewrite: Towards Reproducibility and Transparency in Differentially Private Text Rewritingcited by 28
  11. 2021When differential privacy meets NLP: The devil is in the detailcited by 25
  12. 2021Privacy-Preserving Graph Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 19
  13. 2019BERT Goes to Law School: Quantifying the Competitive Advantage of Access to Large Legal Corpora in Contract Understandingcited by 16
  14. 2022How reparametrization trick broke differentially-private text representation learningcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 6; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

10 papers.