Privacy-Preserving Models for Legal Natural Language Processing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Pre-training large transformer models with in-domain data improves domain adaptation and helps gain performance on the domain-specific downstream tasks. However, sharing models pre-trained on potentially sensitive data is prone to adversarial privacy attacks. In this paper, we asked to which extent we can guarantee privacy of pre-training data and, at the same time, achieve better downstream performance on legal tasks without the need of additional labeled data. We extensively experiment with scalable self-supervised learning of transformer models under the formal paradigm of differential privacy and show that under specific training configurations we can improve downstream performance without sacrifying privacy protection for the in-domain data. Our main contribution is utilizing differential privacy for large-scale pre-training of transformer language models in the legal NLP domain, which, to the best of our knowledge, has not been addressed before.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2022.
Builds on
26 of 40 references.
References · 26
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
- 2016Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translationcited by 1,475
- 2020A Primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT workscited by 815
- 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 650
- 2021Opacus: User-Friendly Differential Privacy Library in PyTorchcited by 383
- 2019R'enyi Differential Privacy of the Sampled Gaussian Mechanismcited by 204
14 more
- 2021When Does Pretraining Help? Assessing Self-Supervised Learning for Law and the CaseHOLD Datasetcited by 201
- 2021Large-Scale Differentially Private BERTcited by 118
- 2022The Text Anonymization Benchmark (TAB): A Dedicated Corpus and Evaluation Framework for Text Anonymizationcited by 95
- 2013Fingerprinting Codes and the Price of Approximate Differential Privacycited by 82
- 2019Differentially Private Model Publishing for Deep Learningcited by 71
- 2014Private Learning and Sanitization: Pure vs. Approximate Differential Privacycited by 63
- 2020Enabling Fast Differentially Private SGD via Just-in-Time Compilation and Vectorizationcited by 58
- 2015Between Pure and Approximate Differential Privacycited by 56
- 2022Mining Legal Arguments in Court Decisionscited by 35
- 2022DP-Rewrite: Towards Reproducibility and Transparency in Differentially Private Text Rewritingcited by 28
- 2021When differential privacy meets NLP: The devil is in the detailcited by 25
- 2021Privacy-Preserving Graph Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 19
- 2019BERT Goes to Law School: Quantifying the Competitive Advantage of Access to Large Legal Corpora in Contract Understandingcited by 16
- 2022How reparametrization trick broke differentially-private text representation learningcited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 6; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
10 papers.
- 2023LEXTREME: A Multi-Lingual and Multi-Task Benchmark for the Legal Domaincited by 68
- 2023Training Data Extraction From Pre-trained Language Models: A Surveycited by 45
- 2024Natural Language Processing for the Legal Domain: A Survey of Tasks, Datasets, Models, and Challengescited by 42
- 2023Differentially Private Natural Language Models: Recent Advances and Future Directionscited by 20
- 2025From ASR to ASP: Evaluating Prompt Attack Vulnerabilities Against Open-Source LLMscited by 6
- 2023Trade-Offs Between Fairness and Privacy in Language Modelingcited by 4
- 2023To share or not to share: What risks would laypeople accept to give sensitive data to differentially-private NLP systems?cited by 3
- 2026Differentially Private and Communication Efficient Large Language Model Split Inference via Stochastic Quantization and Soft Promptcited by 2
- 2026Towards Privacy-Preserving Machine Translation at the Inference Stage: A New Task and Benchmarkcited by 1
- 2023The Ethics of Automating Legal Actorscited by 0
- 2026Towards Privacy-Preserving Machine Translation at the Inference Stage: A New Task and Benchmark16 Mar 2026
- 2026Differentially Private and Communication Efficient Large Language Model Split Inference via Stochastic Quantization and Soft Prompt12 Feb 2026
- 2025From ASR to ASP: Evaluating Prompt Attack Vulnerabilities Against Open-Source LLMs20 May 2025
- 2024Natural Language Processing for the Legal Domain: A Survey of Tasks, Datasets, Models, and Challenges25 Oct 2024
- 2023The Ethics of Automating Legal Actors1 Dec 2023
- 2023To share or not to share: What risks would laypeople accept to give sensitive data to differentially-private NLP systems?13 Jul 2023
- 2023Training Data Extraction From Pre-trained Language Models: A Survey25 May 2023
- 2023Trade-Offs Between Fairness and Privacy in Language Modeling24 May 2023
- 2023LEXTREME: A Multi-Lingual and Multi-Task Benchmark for the Legal Domain30 Jan 2023
- 2023Differentially Private Natural Language Models: Recent Advances and Future Directions22 Jan 2023