Adversarial Defense via Neural Oscillation inspired Gradient Masking
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Spiking neural networks (SNNs) attract great attention due to their low power consumption, low latency, and biological plausibility. As they are widely deployed in neuromorphic devices for low-power brain-inspired computing, security issues become increasingly important. However, compared to deep neural networks (DNNs), SNNs currently lack specifically designed defense methods against adversarial attacks. Inspired by neural membrane potential oscillation, we propose a novel neural model that incorporates the bio-inspired oscillation mechanism to enhance the security of SNNs. Our experiments show that SNNs with neural oscillation neurons have better resistance to adversarial attacks than ordinary SNNs with LIF neurons on kinds of architectures and datasets. Furthermore, we propose a defense method that changes model's gradients by replacing the form of oscillation, which hides the original training gradients and confuses the attacker into using gradients of 'fake' neurons to generate invalid adversarial samples. Our experiments suggest that the proposed defense method can effectively resist both single-step and iterative attacks with comparable defense effectiveness and much less computational costs than adversarial training methods on DNNs. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that establishes adversarial defense through masking surrogate gradients on SNNs.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Nov 2022.
Builds on
24 of 35 references.
References · 24
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,093
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,336
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,379
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,137
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,021
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,767
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,511
- 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 839
- 2019Surrogate Gradient Learning in Spiking Neural Networkscited by 617
- 2017Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural Networkscited by 486
- 2017Spatio-Temporal Backpropagation for Training High-performance Spiking Neural Networkscited by 403
- 2020Incorporating Learnable Membrane Time Constant to Enhance Learning of Spiking Neural Networkscited by 345
12 more
- 2018Deep Learning in Spiking Neural Networkscited by 260
- 2018Direct Training for Spiking Neural Networks: Faster, Larger, Bettercited by 231
- 2018MMA Training: Direct Input Space Margin Maximization through Adversarial Trainingcited by 171
- 2017Towards Robust Neural Networks via Random Self-ensemblecited by 158
- 2021On the Convergence and Robustness of Adversarial Trainingcited by 127
- 2020Inherent Adversarial Robustness of Deep Spiking Neural Networks: Effects of Discrete Input Encoding and Non-Linear Activationscited by 48
- 2019A Comprehensive Analysis on Adversarial Robustness of Spiking Neural Networkscited by 36
- 2020Exploring Adversarial Attack in Spiking Neural Networks with Spike-Compatible Gradientcited by 31
- 2020Securing Deep Spiking Neural Networks against Adversarial Attacks through Inherent Structural Parameterscited by 27
- 2017Spiking Optical Flow for Event-based Sensors Using IBM's TrueNorth Neurosynaptic Systemcited by 14
- 2019Deep Spiking Neural Network with Spike Count based Learning Rulecited by 3
- 2017Training Probabilistic Spiking Neural Networks with First-to-spike Decodingcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.