mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Logographic Information Aids Learning Better Representations for Natural Language Inference

arXiv 2211.02136 ↗First posted 3 Nov 2022cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Statistical language models conventionally implement representation learning based on the contextual distribution of words or other formal units, whereas any information related to the logographic features of written text are often ignored, assuming they should be retrieved relying on the cooccurence statistics. On the other hand, as language models become larger and require more data to learn reliable representations, such assumptions may start to fall back, especially under conditions of data sparsity. Many languages, including Chinese and Vietnamese, use logographic writing systems where surface forms are represented as a visual organization of smaller graphemic units, which often contain many semantic cues. In this paper, we present a novel study which explores the benefits of providing language models with logographic information in learning better semantic representations. We test our hypothesis in the natural language inference (NLI) task by evaluating the benefit of computing multi-modal representations that combine contextual information with glyph information. Our evaluation results in six languages with different typology and writing systems suggest significant benefits of using multi-modal embeddings in languages with logograhic systems, especially for words with less occurence statistics.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2022.

Builds on

14 of 21 references.

References · 14

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
  3. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
  4. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  5. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
  6. 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,285
  7. 2019ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 2,219
  8. 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,046
  9. 2019VL-BERT: Pre-training of Generic Visual-Linguistic Representationscited by 954
  10. 2018XNLI: Evaluating Cross-lingual Sentence Representationscited by 913
  11. 2021Robust Open-Vocabulary Translation from Visual Text Representationscited by 47
  12. 2019Glyce: Glyph-vectors for Chinese Character Representationscited by 46
2 more
  1. 2017Glyph-aware Embedding of Chinese Characterscited by 14
  2. 2017Learning Character-level Compositionality with Visual Featurescited by 12

Built on by

Not cited yet.