mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Multi-Vector Retrieval as Sparse Alignment

arXiv 2211.01267 ↗First posted 2 Nov 2022cs.CL cs.IRcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-vector retrieval models improve over single-vector dual encoders on many information retrieval tasks. In this paper, we cast the multi-vector retrieval problem as sparse alignment between query and document tokens. We propose AligneR, a novel multi-vector retrieval model that learns sparsified pairwise alignments between query and document tokens (e.g. `dog' vs. `puppy') and per-token unary saliences reflecting their relative importance for retrieval. We show that controlling the sparsity of pairwise token alignments often brings significant performance gains. While most factoid questions focusing on a specific part of a document require a smaller number of alignments, others requiring a broader understanding of a document favor a larger number of alignments. Unary saliences, on the other hand, decide whether a token ever needs to be aligned with others for retrieval (e.g. `kind' from `kind of currency is used in new zealand}'). With sparsified unary saliences, we are able to prune a large number of query and document token vectors and improve the efficiency of multi-vector retrieval. We learn the sparse unary saliences with entropy-regularized linear programming, which outperforms other methods to achieve sparsity. In a zero-shot setting, AligneR scores 51.1 points nDCG@10, achieving a new retriever-only state-of-the-art on 13 tasks in the BEIR benchmark. In addition, adapting pairwise alignments with a few examples (<= 8) further improves the performance up to 15.7 points nDCG@10 for argument retrieval tasks. The unary saliences of AligneR helps us to keep only 20% of the document token representations with minimal performance loss. We further show that our model often produces interpretable alignments and significantly improves its performance when initialized from larger language models.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2022.

Builds on

29 of 37 references.

References · 29

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  3. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
  4. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  5. 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,316
  6. 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,605
  7. 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,470
  8. 2021BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Modelscited by 1,252
  9. 2021Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learningcited by 1,216
  10. 2020ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERTcited by 1,178
  11. 2020Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrievalcited by 849
  12. 2019Latent Retrieval for Weakly Supervised Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 695
17 more
  1. 2021ColBERTv2: Effective and Efficient Retrieval via Lightweight Late Interactioncited by 476
  2. 2021Large Dual Encoders Are Generalizable Retrieverscited by 456
  3. 2020RocketQA: An Optimized Training Approach to Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 413
  4. 2021SPLADE: Sparse Lexical and Expansion Model for First Stage Rankingcited by 286
  5. 2022Promptagator: Few-shot Dense Retrieval From 8 Examplescited by 235
  6. 2015Coordinate Descent Algorithmscited by 219
  7. 2020Sparse, Dense, and Attentional Representations for Text Retrievalcited by 214
  8. 2021Simple Entity-Centric Questions Challenge Dense Retrieverscited by 140
  9. 2021SPLADE v2: Sparse Lexical and Expansion Model for Information Retrievalcited by 127
  10. 2021COIL: Revisit Exact Lexical Match in Information Retrieval with Contextualized Inverted Listcited by 113
  11. 2021Adversarial Retriever-Ranker for dense text retrievalcited by 83
  12. 2022Dialog Inpainting: Turning Documents into Dialogscited by 56
  13. 2021Neural Data Augmentation via Example Extrapolationcited by 54
  14. 2021Domain-matched Pre-training Tasks for Dense Retrievalcited by 53
  15. 2020SPARTA: Efficient Open-Domain Question Answering via Sparse Transformer Matching Retrievalcited by 50
  16. 2021Phrase Retrieval Learns Passage Retrieval, Toocited by 33
  17. 2022Introducing Neural Bag of Whole-Words with ColBERTer: Contextualized Late Interactions using Enhanced Reductioncited by 21

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 4.

12 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Aligning Dense Retrievers with LLM Utility via Distillation
  2. 2025Hierarchical Patch Compression for ColPali: Efficient Multi-Vector Document Retrieval with Dynamic Pruning and Quantization
  3. 2025Breaking the Curse of Dimensionality: On the Stability of Modern Vector Retrieval
  4. 2024A Text is Worth Several Tokens: Text Embedding from LLMs Secretly Aligns Well with The Key Tokens
  5. 2026When Does Embedding Magnitude Matter? A Cross-Task Functional-Symmetry Framework
  6. 2024QAEncoder: Towards Aligned Representation Learning in Question Answering Systems
  7. 2025CSPLADE: Learned Sparse Retrieval with Causal Language Models
  8. 2025Towards Lossless Token Pruning in Late-Interaction Retrieval Models