mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Exploring Effects of Computational Parameter Changes to Image Recognition Systems

arXiv 2211.00471 ↗First posted 1 Nov 2022cs.LG cs.SE cs.SYcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Image recognition tasks typically use deep learning and require enormous processing power, thus relying on hardware accelerators like GPUs and FPGAs for fast, timely processing. Failure in real-time image recognition tasks can occur due to incorrect mapping on hardware accelerators, which may lead to timing uncertainty and incorrect behavior. Owing to the increased use of image recognition tasks in safety-critical applications like autonomous driving and medical imaging, it is imperative to assess their robustness to changes in the computational environment as parameters like deep learning frameworks, compiler optimizations for code generation, and hardware devices are not regulated with varying impact on model performance and correctness. In this paper we conduct robustness analysis of four popular image recognition models (MobileNetV2, ResNet101V2, DenseNet121 and InceptionV3) with the ImageNet dataset, assessing the impact of the following parameters in the model's computational environment: (1) deep learning frameworks; (2) compiler optimizations; and (3) hardware devices. We report sensitivity of model performance in terms of output label and inference time for changes in each of these environment parameters. We find that output label predictions for all four models are sensitive to choice of deep learning framework (by up to 57%) and insensitive to other parameters. On the other hand, model inference time was affected by all environment parameters with changes in hardware device having the most effect. The extent of effect was not uniform across models.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2022.

Builds on

22 of 41 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  4. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  5. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  6. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  7. 2021Scaling Vision Transformerscited by 993
  8. 2021CoAtNet: Marrying Convolution and Attention for All Data Sizescited by 566
  9. 2017DeepXplore: Automated Whitebox Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 307
  10. 2017DeepTest: Automated Testing of Deep-Neural-Network-driven Autonomous Carscited by 249
  11. 2014cuDNN: Efficient Primitives for Deep Learningcited by 240
  12. 2019A Survey of the Recent Architectures of Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 211
10 more
  1. 2020Ansor: Generating High-Performance Tensor Programs for Deep Learningcited by 199
  2. 2018Learning to Optimize Tensor Programscited by 138
  3. 2019Taxonomy of Real Faults in Deep Learning Systemscited by 90
  4. 2018TVM: An Automated End-to-End Optimizing Compiler for Deep Learningcited by 62
  5. 2018DeepBillboard: Systematic Physical-World Testing of Autonomous Driving Systemscited by 50
  6. 2016Benchmarking State-of-the-Art Deep Learning Software Toolscited by 17
  7. 2017On the Role of Text Preprocessing in Neural Network Architectures: An Evaluation Study on Text Categorization and Sentiment Analysiscited by 15
  8. 2018Characterising Across-Stack Optimisations for Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 10
  9. 2018A Comparative Measurement Study of Deep Learning as a Service Frameworkcited by 10
  10. 2019VERIFAI: A Toolkit for the Design and Analysis of Artificial Intelligence-Based Systemscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3.

3 papers.