mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CCS Explorer: Relevance Prediction, Extractive Summarization, and Named Entity Recognition from Clinical Cohort Studies

arXiv 2211.00201 ↗First posted 1 Nov 2022cs.CL cs.AI cs.HCcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Clinical Cohort Studies (CCS), such as randomized clinical trials, are a great source of documented clinical research. Ideally, a clinical expert inspects these articles for exploratory analysis ranging from drug discovery for evaluating the efficacy of existing drugs in tackling emerging diseases to the first test of newly developed drugs. However, more than 100 articles are published daily on a single prevalent disease like COVID-19 in PubMed. As a result, it can take days for a physician to find articles and extract relevant information. Can we develop a system to sift through the long list of these articles faster and document the crucial takeaways from each of these articles? In this work, we propose CCS Explorer, an end-to-end system for relevance prediction of sentences, extractive summarization, and patient, outcome, and intervention entity detection from CCS. CCS Explorer is packaged in a web-based graphical user interface where the user can provide any disease name. CCS Explorer then extracts and aggregates all relevant information from articles on PubMed based on the results of an automatically generated query produced on the back-end. For each task, CCS Explorer fine-tunes pre-trained language representation models based on transformers with additional layers. The models are evaluated using two publicly available datasets. CCS Explorer obtains a recall of 80.2%, AUC-ROC of 0.843, and an accuracy of 88.3% on sentence relevance prediction using BioBERT and achieves an average Micro F1-Score of 77.8% on Patient, Intervention, Outcome detection (PIO) using PubMedBERT. Thus, CCS Explorer can reliably extract relevant information to summarize articles, saving time by ~ 660×.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2022.

Builds on

18 of 65 references.

References · 18

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  4. 2019BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text miningcited by 1,935
  5. 2019SciBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Textcited by 1,404
  6. 2019PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 1,100
  7. 2020Domain-Specific Language Model Pretraining for Biomedical Natural Language Processingcited by 996
  8. 2020On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 895
  9. 2019Transfer Learning in Biomedical Natural Language Processing: An Evaluation of BERT and ELMo on Ten Benchmarking Datasetscited by 298
  10. 2019ScispaCy: Fast and Robust Models for Biomedical Natural Language Processingcited by 244
  11. 2020Self-Alignment Pretraining for Biomedical Entity Representationscited by 233
  12. 2020Extractive Summarization as Text Matchingcited by 189
6 more
  1. 2018Bottom-Up Abstractive Summarizationcited by 177
  2. 2019Fine-tune BERT for Extractive Summarizationcited by 122
  3. 2018A Corpus with Multi-Level Annotations of Patients, Interventions and Outcomes to Support Language Processing for Medical Literaturecited by 79
  4. 2019Inferring Which Medical Treatments Work from Reports of Clinical Trialscited by 63
  5. 2020Evidence Inference 2.0: More Data, Better Modelscited by 39
  6. 2020Understanding Clinical Trial Reports: Extracting Medical Entities and Their Relationscited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.