Classical ensemble of Quantum-classical ML algorithms for Phishing detection in Ethereum transaction networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Ethereum is one of the most valuable blockchain networks in terms of the total monetary value locked in it, and arguably been the most active network where new blockchain innovations in research and applications are demonstrated. But, this also leads to Ethereum network being susceptible to a wide variety of threats and attacks in an attempt to gain unreasonable advantage or to undermine the value of the users. Even with the state-of-art classical ML algorithms, detecting such attacks is still hard. This motivated us to build a hybrid system of quantum-classical algorithms that improves phishing detection in financial transaction networks. This paper presents a classical ensemble pipeline of classical and quantum algorithms and a detailed study benchmarking existing Quantum Machine Learning algorithms such as Quantum Support Vector Machine and Variational Quantum Classifier. With the current generation of quantum hardware available, smaller datasets are more suited to the QML models and most research restricts to hundreds of samples. However, we experimented on different data sizes and report results with a test data of 12K transaction nodes, which is to the best of the authors knowledge the largest QML experiment run so far on any real quantum hardware. The classical ensembles of quantum-classical models improved the macro F-score and phishing F-score. One key observation is QSVM constantly gives lower false positives, thereby higher precision compared with any other classical or quantum network, which is always preferred for any anomaly detection problem. This is true for QSVMs when used individually or via bagging of same models or in combination with other classical/quantum models making it the most advantageous quantum algorithm so far. The proposed ensemble framework is generic and can be applied for any classification task
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2022.
Builds on
11 of 43 references.
References · 11
- 2018Supervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spacescited by 654
- 2019Parameterized quantum circuits as machine learning modelscited by 330
- 2020A rigorous and robust quantum speed-up in supervised machine learningcited by 270
- 2021A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Anomaly Detection with Deep Learningcited by 230
- 2021Supervised quantum machine learning models are kernel methodscited by 199
- 2019Quantum Graph Neural Networkscited by 66
- 2020Quantum Convolutional Neural Networks for High Energy Physics Data Analysiscited by 64
- 2021Quantum kernels for real-world predictions based on electronic health recordscited by 15
- 2020Quantum Ensemble for Classificationcited by 11
- 2019Quantum Algorithms for Portfolio Optimizationcited by 8
- 2020Quantum Boostingcited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1.
3 papers.
- 2023Quantum Machine Learning on Near-Term Quantum Devices: Current State of Supervised and Unsupervised Techniques for Real-World Applicationscited by 14
- 2023Towards Efficient Quantum Anomaly Detection: One-Class SVMs using Variable Subsampling and Randomized Measurementscited by 2
- 2024Efficient Quantum One-Class Support Vector Machines for Anomaly Detection Using Randomized Measurements and Variable Subsamplingcited by 0
- 2024Efficient Quantum One-Class Support Vector Machines for Anomaly Detection Using Randomized Measurements and Variable Subsampling30 Jul 2024
- 2023Towards Efficient Quantum Anomaly Detection: One-Class SVMs using Variable Subsampling and Randomized Measurements14 Dec 2023
- 2023Quantum Machine Learning on Near-Term Quantum Devices: Current State of Supervised and Unsupervised Techniques for Real-World Applications3 Jul 2023