mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Effective Cross-Task Transfer Learning for Explainable Natural Language Inference with T5

arXiv 2210.17301 ↗First posted 31 Oct 2022cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We compare sequential fine-tuning with a model for multi-task learning in the context where we are interested in boosting performance on two tasks, one of which depends on the other. We test these models on the FigLang2022 shared task which requires participants to predict language inference labels on figurative language along with corresponding textual explanations of the inference predictions. Our results show that while sequential multi-task learning can be tuned to be good at the first of two target tasks, it performs less well on the second and additionally struggles with overfitting. Our findings show that simple sequential fine-tuning of text-to-text models is an extraordinarily powerful method for cross-task knowledge transfer while simultaneously predicting multiple interdependent targets. So much so, that our best model achieved the (tied) highest score on the task.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Oct 2022.

Builds on

21 of 30 references.

References · 21

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  2. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  3. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
  4. 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,483
  5. 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
  6. 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
  7. 2020AdapterFusion: Non-Destructive Task Composition for Transfer Learningcited by 780
  8. 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 656
  9. 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 590
  10. 2018e-SNLI: Natural Language Inference with Natural Language Explanationscited by 468
  11. 2020AdapterDrop: On the Efficiency of Adapters in Transformerscited by 223
  12. 2018Sentence Encoders on STILTs: Supplementary Training on Intermediate Labeled-data Taskscited by 214
9 more
  1. 2020WT5?! Training Text-to-Text Models to Explain their Predictionscited by 148
  2. 2018Breaking NLI Systems with Sentences that Require Simple Lexical Inferencescited by 134
  3. 2022Testing the Ability of Language Models to Interpret Figurative Languagecited by 67
  4. 2016A Joint Many-Task Model: Growing a Neural Network for Multiple NLP Taskscited by 62
  5. 2021Multi-Task Learning in Natural Language Processing: An Overviewcited by 61
  6. 2020Assessing Phrasal Representation and Composition in Transformerscited by 41
  7. 2022SemEval-2022 Task 2: Multilingual Idiomaticity Detection and Sentence Embeddingcited by 36
  8. 2021AStitchInLanguageModels: Dataset and Methods for the Exploration of Idiomaticity in Pre-Trained Language Modelscited by 27
  9. 2018Deep Cascade Multi-task Learning for Slot Filling in Online Shopping Assistantcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.

2 papers.