mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Time-aware Metapath Feature Augmentation for Ponzi Detection in Ethereum

arXiv 2210.16863 ↗First posted 30 Oct 2022cs.LG q-fin.STcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the development of Web 3.0 which emphasizes decentralization, blockchain technology ushers in its revolution and also brings numerous challenges, particularly in the field of cryptocurrency. Recently, a large number of criminal behaviors continuously emerge on blockchain, such as Ponzi schemes and phishing scams, which severely endanger decentralized finance. Existing graph-based abnormal behavior detection methods on blockchain usually focus on constructing homogeneous transaction graphs without distinguishing the heterogeneity of nodes and edges, resulting in partial loss of transaction pattern information. Although existing heterogeneous modeling methods can depict richer information through metapaths, the extracted metapaths generally neglect temporal dependencies between entities and do not reflect real behavior. In this paper, we introduce Time-aware Metapath Feature Augmentation (TMFAug) as a plug-and-play module to capture the real metapath-based transaction patterns during Ponzi scheme detection on Ethereum. The proposed module can be adaptively combined with existing graph-based Ponzi detection methods. Extensive experimental results show that our TMFAug can help existing Ponzi detection methods achieve significant performance improvements on the Ethereum dataset, indicating the effectiveness of heterogeneous temporal information for Ponzi scheme detection.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2022.

Builds on

24 of 56 references.

References · 24

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  3. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
  4. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
  5. 2016node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networkscited by 1,918
  6. 2014DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representationscited by 1,547
  7. 2015LINE: Large-scale Information Network Embeddingcited by 582
  8. 2019Graph Transformer Networkscited by 523
  9. 2017Heterogeneous Information Network Embedding for Recommendationcited by 133
  10. 2015A Survey of Heterogeneous Information Network Analysiscited by 110
  11. 2021A Comprehensive Survey on Community Detection with Deep Learningcited by 63
  12. 2019Who Are the Phishers? Phishing Scam Detection on Ethereum via Network Embeddingcited by 39
12 more
  1. 2017Dissecting Ponzi schemes on Ethereum: identification, analysis, and impactcited by 19
  2. 2022Behavior-aware Account De-anonymization on Ethereum Interaction Graphcited by 17
  3. 2019Subgraph Networks with Application to Structural Feature Space Expansioncited by 16
  4. 2018A Survey on the Security of Blockchain Systemscited by 12
  5. 2020M-Evolve: Structural-Mapping-Based Data Augmentation for Graph Classificationcited by 11
  6. 2021Embedding Heterogeneous Networks into Hyperbolic Space Without Meta-pathcited by 9
  7. 2022Heterogeneous Feature Augmentation for Ponzi Detection in Ethereumcited by 9
  8. 2018Target Defense Against Link-Prediction-Based Attacks via Evolutionary Perturbationscited by 7
  9. 2019RobustECD: Enhancement of Network Structure for Robust Community Detectioncited by 7
  10. 2022Dual-channel Early Warning Framework for Ethereum Ponzi Schemescited by 6
  11. 2021Forsage: Anatomy of a Smart-Contract Pyramid Schemecited by 4
  12. 2021Ponzi Scheme Detection in EthereumTransaction Networkcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

4 papers.