Regret Bounds and Experimental Design for Estimate-then-Optimize
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In practical applications, data is used to make decisions in two steps: estimation and optimization. First, a machine learning model estimates parameters for a structural model relating decisions to outcomes. Second, a decision is chosen to optimize the structural model's predicted outcome as if its parameters were correctly estimated. Due to its flexibility and simple implementation, this ``estimate-then-optimize'' approach is often used for data-driven decision-making. Errors in the estimation step can lead estimate-then-optimize to sub-optimal decisions that result in regret, i.e., a difference in value between the decision made and the best decision available with knowledge of the structural model's parameters. We provide a novel bound on this regret for smooth and unconstrained optimization problems. Using this bound, in settings where estimated parameters are linear transformations of sub-Gaussian random vectors, we provide a general procedure for experimental design to minimize the regret resulting from estimate-then-optimize. We demonstrate our approach on simple examples and a pandemic control application.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Oct 2022.
Builds on
6 of 21 references.
References · 6
- 2017Smart "Predict, then Optimize"cited by 339
- 2018Melding the Data-Decisions Pipeline: Decision-Focused Learning for Combinatorial Optimizationcited by 227
- 2019Orthogonal Statistical Learningcited by 151
- 2013Data-Driven Robust Optimizationcited by 85
- 2019Generalization Bounds in the Predict-then-Optimize Frameworkcited by 54
- 2020Fast Rates for Contextual Linear Optimizationcited by 43
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.