LP-BFGS attack: An adversarial attack based on the Hessian with limited pixels
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Most L0-norm based white-box attacks craft perturbations by the gradient of models to the input. Since the computation cost and memory limitation of calculating the Hessian matrix, the application of Hessian or approximate Hessian in white-box attacks is gradually shelved. In this work, we note that the sparsity requirement on perturbations naturally lends itself to the usage of Hessian information. We study the attack performance and computation cost of the attack method based on the Hessian with a limited number of perturbation pixels. Specifically, we propose the Limited Pixel BFGS (LP-BFGS) attack method by incorporating the perturbation pixel selection strategy and the BFGS algorithm. Pixels with top-k attribution scores calculated by the Integrated Gradient method are regarded as optimization variables of the LP-BFGS attack. Experimental results across different networks and datasets demonstrate that our approach has comparable attack ability with reasonable computation in different numbers of perturbation pixels compared with existing solutions.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Oct 2022.
Builds on
30 of 49 references.
References · 30
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,436
18 more
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
- 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,318
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
- 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 840
- 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 790
- 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 784
- 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 689
- 2017ZOO: Zeroth Order Optimization based Black-box Attacks to Deep Neural Networks without Training Substitute Modelscited by 666
- 2013Network In Networkcited by 605
- 2017One pixel attack for fooling deep neural networkscited by 582
- 2017Decision-Based Adversarial Attacks: Reliable Attacks Against Black-Box Machine Learning Modelscited by 462
- 2017EAD: Elastic-Net Attacks to Deep Neural Networks via Adversarial Examplescited by 155
- 2018SparseFool: a few pixels make a big differencecited by 94
- 2020Sparse-RS: a versatile framework for query-efficient sparse black-box adversarial attackscited by 65
- 2022Deep-Attack over the Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
- 2020GreedyFool: Multi-Factor Imperceptibility and Its Application to Designing a Black-box Adversarial Attackcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
3 papers.