mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Toward domain generalized pruning by scoring out-of-distribution importance

arXiv 2210.13810 ↗First posted 25 Oct 2022cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Filter pruning has been widely used for compressing convolutional neural networks to reduce computation costs during the deployment stage. Recent studies have shown that filter pruning techniques can achieve lossless compression of deep neural networks, reducing redundant filters (kernels) without sacrificing accuracy performance. However, the evaluation is done when the training and testing data are from similar environmental conditions (independent and identically distributed), and how the filter pruning techniques would affect the cross-domain generalization (out-of-distribution) performance is largely ignored. We conduct extensive empirical experiments and reveal that although the intra-domain performance could be maintained after filter pruning, the cross-domain performance will decay to a large extent. As scoring a filter's importance is one of the central problems for pruning, we design the importance scoring estimation by using the variance of domain-level risks to consider the pruning risk in the unseen distribution. As such, we can remain more domain generalized filters. The experiments show that under the same pruning ratio, our method can achieve significantly better cross-domain generalization performance than the baseline filter pruning method. For the first attempt, our work sheds light on the joint problem of domain generalization and filter pruning research.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Oct 2022.

Builds on

21 of 25 references.

References · 21

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
  3. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
  4. 2017Adversarial Discriminative Domain Adaptationcited by 1,309
  5. 2016Deep CORAL: Correlation Alignment for Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 1,194
  6. 2020In Search of Lost Domain Generalizationcited by 1,042
  7. 2017Deeper, Broader and Artier Domain Generalizationcited by 983
  8. 2021Domain Generalization: A Surveycited by 760
  9. 2020Out-of-Distribution Generalization via Risk Extrapolation (REx)cited by 737
  10. 2019Importance Estimation for Neural Network Pruningcited by 531
  11. 2017ThiNet: A Filter Level Pruning Method for Deep Neural Network Compressioncited by 438
  12. 2018AMC: AutoML for Model Compression and Acceleration on Mobile Devicescited by 375
9 more
  1. 2020Learning to Generate Novel Domains for Domain Generalizationcited by 296
  2. 2020Improve Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Mixup Trainingcited by 185
  3. 2020Neural Pruning via Growing Regularizationcited by 97
  4. 2020ResRep: Lossless CNN Pruning via Decoupling Remembering and Forgettingcited by 85
  5. 2021Lost in Pruning: The Effects of Pruning Neural Networks beyond Test Accuracycited by 62
  6. 2021Neuron Coverage-Guided Domain Generalizationcited by 19
  7. 2020Channel Pruning Guided by Classification Loss and Feature Importancecited by 17
  8. 2020ADMP: An Adversarial Double Masks Based Pruning Framework For Unsupervised Cross-Domain Compressioncited by 3
  9. 2017Structural Compression of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.