MISm: A Medical Image Segmentation Metric for Evaluation of weak labeled Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Performance measures are an important tool for assessing and comparing different medical image segmentation algorithms. Unfortunately, the current measures have their weaknesses when it comes to assessing certain edge cases. These limitations arouse when images with a very small region of interest or without a region of interest at all are assessed. As a solution for these limitations, we propose a new medical image segmentation metric: MISm. To evaluate MISm, the popular metrics in the medical image segmentation and MISm were compared using images of magnet resonance tomography from several scenarios. In order to allow application in the community and reproducibility of experimental results, we included MISm in the publicly available evaluation framework MISeval: https://github.com/frankkramer-lab/miseval/tree/master/miseval
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2022.
Builds on
8 of 25 references.
References · 8
- 2017A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysiscited by 1,182
- 2020Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlationcited by 420
- 2022Metrics reloaded: Recommendations for image analysis validationcited by 190
- 2017Superhuman Accuracy on the SNEMI3D Connectomics Challengecited by 64
- 2022Towards a Guideline for Evaluation Metrics in Medical Image Segmentationcited by 58
- 2019Going Deep in Medical Image Analysis: Concepts, Methods, Challenges and Future Directionscited by 24
- 2021Rethinking Semantic Segmentation Evaluation for Explainability and Model Selectioncited by 11
- 2022MISeval: a Metric Library for Medical Image Segmentation Evaluationcited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.