mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Exploring Self-Attention for Crop-type Classification Explainability

arXiv 2210.13167 ↗First posted 24 Oct 2022cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Transformer models have become a promising approach for crop-type classification. Although their attention weights can be used to understand the relevant time points for crop disambiguation, the validity of these insights depends on how closely the attention weights approximate the actual workings of these black-box models, which is not always clear. In this paper, we introduce a novel explainability framework that systematically evaluates the explanatory power of the attention weights of a standard transformer encoder for crop-type classification. Our results show that attention patterns strongly relate to key dates, which are often associated with critical phenological events for crop-type classification. Further, the sensitivity analysis reveals the limited capability of the attention weights to characterize crop phenology as the identified phenological events depend on the other crops considered during training. This limitation highlights the relevance of future work towards the development of deep learning approaches capable of automatically learning the temporal vegetation dynamics for accurate crop disambiguation

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2022.

Builds on

21 of 43 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  4. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  5. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  6. 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 994
  7. 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 916
  8. 2019Attention is not not Explanationcited by 629
  9. 2020Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualizationcited by 620
  10. 2018A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 467
  11. 2019Is Attention Interpretable?cited by 387
  12. 2018Video Action Transformer Networkcited by 316
9 more
  1. 2019Explainable Machine Learning for Scientific Insights and Discoveriescited by 165
  2. 2020Explainable Deep Learning: A Field Guide for the Uninitiatedcited by 127
  3. 2022XAI for Transformers: Better Explanations through Conservative Propagationcited by 100
  4. 2019Self-attention for raw optical Satellite Time Series Classificationcited by 75
  5. 2019Satellite Image Time Series Classification with Pixel-Set Encoders and Temporal Self-Attentioncited by 71
  6. 2020Lightweight Temporal Self-Attention for Classifying Satellite Image Time Seriescited by 55
  7. 2021Multi-Modal Temporal Attention Models for Crop Mapping from Satellite Time Seriescited by 49
  8. 2021Is Sparse Attention more Interpretable?cited by 31
  9. 2018Interpretable Spatio-temporal Attention for Video Action Recognitioncited by 20

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

3 papers.