mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Are Deep Sequence Classifiers Good at Non-Trivial Generalization?

arXiv 2210.13082 ↗First posted 24 Oct 2022cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in deep learning models for sequence classification have greatly improved their classification accuracy, specially when large training sets are available. However, several works have suggested that under some settings the predictions made by these models are poorly calibrated. In this work we study binary sequence classification problems and we look at model calibration from a different perspective by asking the question: Are deep learning models capable of learning the underlying target class distribution? We focus on sparse sequence classification, that is problems in which the target class is rare and compare three deep learning sequence classification models. We develop an evaluation that measures how well a classifier is learning the target class distribution. In addition, our evaluation disentangles good performance achieved by mere compression of the training sequences versus performance achieved by proper model generalization. Our results suggest that in this binary setting the deep-learning models are indeed able to learn the underlying class distribution in a non-trivial manner, i.e. by proper generalization beyond data compression.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2022.

Builds on

19 of 30 references.

References · 19

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  5. 2019Neural Spline Flowscited by 590
  6. 2020Calibration of Pre-trained Transformerscited by 307
  7. 2019A Comparative Study on Transformer vs RNN in Speech Applicationscited by 210
  8. 2021Are Transformers More Robust Than CNNs?cited by 187
  9. 2016Exploring the Limits of Language Modelingcited by 172
  10. 2016Neural Autoregressive Distribution Estimationcited by 94
  11. 2017Comparative Study of CNN and RNN for Natural Language Processingcited by 81
  12. 2019Calibration of Encoder Decoder Models for Neural Machine Translationcited by 67
7 more
  1. 2019Block Neural Autoregressive Flowcited by 62
  2. 2018Transformation Autoregressive Networkscited by 27
  3. 2018A Comparison of Transformer and Recurrent Neural Networks on Multilingual Neural Machine Translationcited by 23
  4. 2020TraDE: Transformers for Density Estimationcited by 18
  5. 2018Connecting Weighted Automata and Recurrent Neural Networks through Spectral Learningcited by 15
  6. 2017Near Perfect Protein Multi-Label Classification with Deep Neural Networkscited by 1
  7. 2017A Maximum Matching Algorithm for Basis Selection in Spectral Learningcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.