Are Current Decoding Strategies Capable of Facing the Challenges of Visual Dialogue?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Decoding strategies play a crucial role in natural language generation systems. They are usually designed and evaluated in open-ended text-only tasks, and it is not clear how different strategies handle the numerous challenges that goal-oriented multimodal systems face (such as grounding and informativeness). To answer this question, we compare a wide variety of different decoding strategies and hyper-parameter configurations in a Visual Dialogue referential game. Although none of them successfully balance lexical richness, accuracy in the task, and visual grounding, our in-depth analysis allows us to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of each decoding strategy. We believe our findings and suggestions may serve as a starting point for designing more effective decoding algorithms that handle the challenges of Visual Dialogue tasks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2022.
Builds on
9 of 16 references.
References · 9
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
- 2018Object Hallucination in Image Captioningcited by 661
- 2016GuessWhat?! Visual object discovery through multi-modal dialoguecited by 112
- 2020Trading Off Diversity and Quality in Natural Language Generationcited by 94
- 2019How Decoding Strategies Affect the Verifiability of Generated Textcited by 27
- 2018Beyond task success: A closer look at jointly learning to see, ask, and GuessWhatcited by 15
- 2021Looking for Confirmations: An Effective and Human-Like Visual Dialogue Strategycited by 4
- 2021The Interplay of Task Success and Dialogue Quality: An in-depth Evaluation in Task-Oriented Visual Dialoguescited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.