mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards Pragmatic Production Strategies for Natural Language Generation Tasks

arXiv 2210.12828 ↗First posted 23 Oct 2022cs.CL cs.AIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This position paper proposes a conceptual framework for the design of Natural Language Generation (NLG) systems that follow efficient and effective production strategies in order to achieve complex communicative goals. In this general framework, efficiency is characterised as the parsimonious regulation of production and comprehension costs while effectiveness is measured with respect to task-oriented and contextually grounded communicative goals. We provide concrete suggestions for the estimation of goals, costs, and utility via modern statistical methods, demonstrating applications of our framework to the classic pragmatic task of visually grounded referential games and to abstractive text summarisation, two popular generation tasks with real-world applications. In sum, we advocate for the development of NLG systems that learn to make pragmatic production decisions from experience, by reasoning about goals, costs, and utility in a human-like way.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Oct 2022.

Builds on

6 of 32 references.

References · 6

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
  3. 2019The PhotoBook Dataset: Building Common Ground through Visually-Grounded Dialoguecited by 46
  4. 2019Characterizing the dynamics of learning in repeated reference gamescited by 34
  5. 2020A Rate-Distortion view of human pragmatic reasoningcited by 19
  6. 2021Extending rational models of communication from beliefs to actionscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

7 papers.