Multi-scale data reconstruction of turbulent rotating flows with Gappy POD, Extended POD and Generative Adversarial Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Data reconstruction of rotating turbulent snapshots is investigated utilizing data-driven tools. This problem is crucial for numerous geophysical applications and fundamental aspects, given the concurrent effects of direct and inverse energy cascades, which lead to non-Gaussian statistics at both large and small scales. Data assimilation also serves as a tool to rank physical features within turbulence, by evaluating the performance of reconstruction in terms of the quality and quantity of the information used. Additionally, benchmarking various reconstruction techniques is essential to assess the trade-off between quantitative supremacy, implementation complexity, and explicability. In this study, we use linear and non-linear tools based on the Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) and Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) for reconstructing rotating turbulence snapshots with spatial damages (inpainting). We focus on accurately reproducing both statistical properties and instantaneous velocity fields. Different gap sizes and gap geometries are investigated in order to assess the importance of coherency and multi-scale properties of the missing information. Surprisingly enough, concerning point-wise reconstruction, the non-linear GAN does not outperform one of the linear POD techniques. On the other hand, supremacy of the GAN approach is shown when the statistical multi-scale properties are compared. Similarly, extreme events in the gap region are better predicted when using GAN. The balance between point-wise error and statistical properties is controlled by the adversarial ratio, which determines the relative importance of the generator and the discriminator in the GAN training. Robustness against the measurement noise is also discussed.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 85 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Oct 2022.
Builds on
9 of 85 references.
References · 9
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2016Context Encoders: Feature Learning by Inpaintingcited by 1,424
- 2020Convolutional-network models to predict wall-bounded turbulence from wall quantitiescited by 46
- 2018Missing Data Reconstruction in Remote Sensing image with a Unified Spatial-Temporal-Spectral Deep Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 26
- 2020Turbulence Enrichment using Physics-informed Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 18
- 2020Reconstruction of turbulent data with deep generative models for semantic inpainting from TURB-Rot databasecited by 17
- 2020TURB-Rot. A large database of 3d and 2d snapshots from turbulent rotating flowscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 5; 2025: 2.
8 papers.
- 2024Scientific Machine Learning Based Reduced-Order Models for Plasma Turbulence Simulationscited by 6
- 2024EngineBench: Flow Reconstruction in the Transparent Combustion Chamber III Optical Enginecited by 2
- 2024Reconstructing unsteady flows from sparse, noisy measurements with a physics-constrained convolutional neural networkcited by 2
- 2025Spatiotemporal wall pressure forecast of a rectangular cylinder with physics-aware DeepU-Fourier neural networkcited by 2
- 2023Filtered Partial Differential Equations: a robust surrogate constraint in physics-informed deep learning frameworkcited by 1
- 2024Stochastic Reconstruction of Gappy Lagrangian Turbulent Signals by Conditional Diffusion Modelscited by 1
- 2024Comparison of Generative Learning Methods for Turbulence Surrogatescited by 1
- 2025Vector-based loss functions for turbulent flow field inpaintingcited by 0
- 2025Vector-based loss functions for turbulent flow field inpainting6 Sep 2025
- 2025Spatiotemporal wall pressure forecast of a rectangular cylinder with physics-aware DeepU-Fourier neural network5 Aug 2025
- 2024Comparison of Generative Learning Methods for Turbulence Surrogates25 Nov 2024
- 2024Stochastic Reconstruction of Gappy Lagrangian Turbulent Signals by Conditional Diffusion Models31 Oct 2024
- 2024Reconstructing unsteady flows from sparse, noisy measurements with a physics-constrained convolutional neural network30 Aug 2024
- 2024EngineBench: Flow Reconstruction in the Transparent Combustion Chamber III Optical Engine5 Jun 2024
- 2024Scientific Machine Learning Based Reduced-Order Models for Plasma Turbulence Simulations11 Jan 2024
- 2023Filtered Partial Differential Equations: a robust surrogate constraint in physics-informed deep learning framework7 Nov 2023