mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Mathematical Justification of Hard Negative Mining via Isometric Approximation Theorem

arXiv 2210.11173 ↗First posted 20 Oct 2022cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In deep metric learning, the Triplet Loss has emerged as a popular method to learn many computer vision and natural language processing tasks such as facial recognition, object detection, and visual-semantic embeddings. One issue that plagues the Triplet Loss is network collapse, an undesirable phenomenon where the network projects the embeddings of all data onto a single point. Researchers predominately solve this problem by using triplet mining strategies. While hard negative mining is the most effective of these strategies, existing formulations lack strong theoretical justification for their empirical success. In this paper, we utilize the mathematical theory of isometric approximation to show an equivalence between the Triplet Loss sampled by hard negative mining and an optimization problem that minimizes a Hausdorff-like distance between the neural network and its ideal counterpart function. This provides the theoretical justifications for hard negative mining's empirical efficacy. In addition, our novel application of the isometric approximation theorem provides the groundwork for future forms of hard negative mining that avoid network collapse. Our theory can also be extended to analyze other Euclidean space-based metric learning methods like Ladder Loss or Contrastive Learning.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2022.

Builds on

18 of 25 references.

References · 18

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  3. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  4. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
  5. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,833
  6. 2020Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised Learnerscited by 1,375
  7. 2014Show and Tell: A Neural Image Caption Generatorcited by 877
  8. 2017In Defense of the Triplet Loss for Person Re-Identificationcited by 784
  9. 2017SphereFace: Deep Hypersphere Embedding for Face Recognitioncited by 733
  10. 2015Deep Metric Learning via Lifted Structured Feature Embeddingcited by 449
  11. 2020CSI: Novelty Detection via Contrastive Learning on Distributionally Shifted Instancescited by 441
  12. 2017Sampling Matters in Deep Embedding Learningcited by 285
6 more
  1. 2014Deep Fragment Embeddings for Bidirectional Image Sentence Mappingcited by 99
  2. 2020Hard negative examples are hard, but usefulcited by 82
  3. 2015Learning to Answer Questions From Image Using Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 23
  4. 2019Ladder Loss for Coherent Visual-Semantic Embeddingcited by 15
  5. 2020Rethinking preventing class-collapsing in metric learning with margin-based lossescited by 10
  6. 2019Visual-Textual Association with Hardest and Semi-Hard Negative Pairs Mining for Person Searchcited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.