Language Models Understand Us, Poorly
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Some claim language models understand us. Others won't hear it. To clarify, I investigate three views of human language understanding: as-mapping, as-reliability and as-representation. I argue that while behavioral reliability is necessary for understanding, internal representations are sufficient; they climb the right hill. I review state-of-the-art language and multi-modal models: they are pragmatically challenged by under-specification of form. I question the Scaling Paradigm: limits on resources may prohibit scaled-up models from approaching understanding. Last, I describe how as-representation advances a science of understanding. We need work which probes model internals, adds more of human language, and measures what models can learn.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Oct 2022.
Builds on
35 of 81 references.
References · 35
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,539
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2022Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understandingcited by 6,322
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
- 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,276
- 2022LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applicationscited by 1,218
- 2022In-context Learning and Induction Headscited by 930
- 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
- 2022A Generalist Agentcited by 802
- 2022AudioLM: a Language Modeling Approach to Audio Generationcited by 611
- 2022Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionalitycited by 523
23 more
- 2021Causal Abstractions of Neural Networkscited by 401
- 2020Experience Grounds Languagecited by 241
- 2022The Carbon Footprint of Machine Learning Training Will Plateau, Then Shrinkcited by 183
- 2021Implicit Representations of Meaning in Neural Language Modelscited by 179
- 2022SCROLLS: Standardized CompaRison Over Long Language Sequencescited by 170
- 2021How much do language models copy from their training data? Evaluating linguistic novelty in text generation using RAVENcited by 124
- 2020How Can We Accelerate Progress Towards Human-like Linguistic Generalization?cited by 114
- 2022A very preliminary analysis of DALL-E 2cited by 82
- 2018Image Chat: Engaging Grounded Conversationscited by 76
- 2019Approximate Causal Abstractioncited by 62
- 2022Testing Relational Understanding in Text-Guided Image Generationcited by 59
- 2021What Would Jiminy Cricket Do? Towards Agents That Behave Morallycited by 57
- 2021Provable Limitations of Acquiring Meaning from Ungrounded Form: What Will Future Language Models Understand?cited by 55
- 2020Word meaning in minds and machinescited by 51
- 2019Environmental drivers of systematicity and generalization in a situated agentcited by 50
- 2021Grounding 'Grounding' in NLPcited by 44
- 2020Effects of Parameter Norm Growth During Transformer Training: Inductive Bias from Gradient Descentcited by 40
- 2022What Do NLP Researchers Believe? Results of the NLP Community Metasurveycited by 28
- 2021Symbolic Behaviour in Artificial Intelligencecited by 24
- 2022Unit Testing for Concepts in Neural Networkscited by 23
- 2022Abstraction for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 19
- 2021Emergent Communication under Competitioncited by 17
- 2020PuzzLing Machines: A Challenge on Learning From Small Datacited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2.
3 papers.