HMM vs. CTC for Automatic Speech Recognition: Comparison Based on Full-Sum Training from Scratch
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this work, we compare from-scratch sequence-level cross-entropy (full-sum) training of Hidden Markov Model (HMM) and Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC) topologies for automatic speech recognition (ASR). Besides accuracy, we further analyze their capability for generating high-quality time alignment between the speech signal and the transcription, which can be crucial for many subsequent applications. Moreover, we propose several methods to improve convergence of from-scratch full-sum training by addressing the alignment modeling issue. Systematic comparison is conducted on both Switchboard and LibriSpeech corpora across CTC, posterior HMM with and w/o transition probabilities, and standard hybrid HMM. We also provide a detailed analysis of both Viterbi forced-alignment and Baum-Welch full-sum occupation probabilities.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023End-to-End Speech Recognition: A Surveycited by 129
- 2023RASR2: The RWTH ASR Toolkit for Generic Sequence-to-sequence Speech Recognitioncited by 3
- 2024The Conformer Encoder May Reverse the Time Dimensioncited by 2
- 2023End-to-End Training of a Neural HMM with Label and Transition Probabilitiescited by 1
- 2024The Conformer Encoder May Reverse the Time Dimension1 Oct 2024
- 2023End-to-End Training of a Neural HMM with Label and Transition Probabilities4 Oct 2023
- 2023RASR2: The RWTH ASR Toolkit for Generic Sequence-to-sequence Speech Recognition28 May 2023
- 2023End-to-End Speech Recognition: A Survey3 Mar 2023