mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Improving Contrastive Learning on Visually Homogeneous Mars Rover Images

arXiv 2210.09234 ↗First posted 17 Oct 2022cs.CV cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Contrastive learning has recently demonstrated superior performance to supervised learning, despite requiring no training labels. We explore how contrastive learning can be applied to hundreds of thousands of unlabeled Mars terrain images, collected from the Mars rovers Curiosity and Perseverance, and from the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. Such methods are appealing since the vast majority of Mars images are unlabeled as manual annotation is labor intensive and requires extensive domain knowledge. Contrastive learning, however, assumes that any given pair of distinct images contain distinct semantic content. This is an issue for Mars image datasets, as any two pairs of Mars images are far more likely to be semantically similar due to the lack of visual diversity on the planet's surface. Making the assumption that pairs of images will be in visual contrast - when they are in fact not - results in pairs that are falsely considered as negatives, impacting training performance. In this study, we propose two approaches to resolve this: 1) an unsupervised deep clustering step on the Mars datasets, which identifies clusters of images containing similar semantic content and corrects false negative errors during training, and 2) a simple approach which mixes data from different domains to increase visual diversity of the total training dataset. Both cases reduce the rate of false negative pairs, thus minimizing the rate in which the model is incorrectly penalized during contrastive training. These modified approaches remain fully unsupervised end-to-end. To evaluate their performance, we add a single linear layer trained to generate class predictions based on these contrastively-learned features and demonstrate increased performance compared to supervised models; observing an improvement in classification accuracy of 3.06% using only 10% of the labeled data.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2022.

Builds on

18 of 30 references.

References · 18

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  4. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  5. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  6. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  7. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  8. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  9. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,282
  10. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,488
  11. 2020Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised Learnerscited by 1,375
  12. 2020Boosting Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning with False Negative Cancellationcited by 119
6 more
  1. 2021Incremental False Negative Detection for Contrastive Learningcited by 48
  2. 2018Deep Texture Manifold for Ground Terrain Recognitioncited by 32
  3. 2021Mars Image Content Classification: Three Years of NASA Deployment and Recent Advancescited by 10
  4. 2022Mars Terrain Segmentation with Less Labelscited by 7
  5. 2022Self-Supervised Learning to Guide Scientifically Relevant Categorization of Martian Terrain Imagescited by 5
  6. 2022Semi-Supervised Learning for Mars Imagery Classification and Segmentationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.