Prioritizing emergency evacuations under compounding levels of uncertainty
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Well-executed emergency evacuations can save lives and reduce suffering. However, decision makers struggle to determine optimal evacuation policies given the chaos, uncertainty, and value judgments inherent in emergency evacuations. We propose and analyze a decision support tool for pre-crisis training exercises for teams preparing for civilian evacuations and explore the tool in the case of the 2021 U.S.-led evacuation from Afghanistan. We use different classes of Markov decision processes (MDPs) to capture compounding levels of uncertainty in (1) the priority category of who appears next at the gate for evacuation, (2) the distribution of priority categories at the population level, and (3) individuals' claimed priority category. We compare the number of people evacuated by priority status under eight heuristic policies. The optimized MDP policy achieves the best performance compared to all heuristic baselines. We also show that accounting for the compounding levels of model uncertainty incurs added complexity without improvement in policy performance. Useful heuristics can be extracted from the optimized policies to inform human decision makers. We open-source all tools to encourage robust dialogue about the trade-offs, limitations, and potential of integrating algorithms into high-stakes humanitarian decision-making.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2022.
Builds on
4 of 27 references.
References · 4
- 2019Discrimination in the Age of Algorithmscited by 51
- 2019Non-Stationary Markov Decision Processes, a Worst-Case Approach using Model-Based Reinforcement Learning, Extended versioncited by 36
- 2016POMDP-lite for Robust Robot Planning under Uncertaintycited by 12
- 2020Uncertainty Aware Wildfire Managementcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.