mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Scratching Visual Transformer's Back with Uniform Attention

arXiv 2210.08457 ↗First posted 16 Oct 2022cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The favorable performance of Vision Transformers (ViTs) is often attributed to the multi-head self-attention (MSA). The MSA enables global interactions at each layer of a ViT model, which is a contrasting feature against Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) that gradually increase the range of interaction across multiple layers. We study the role of the density of the attention. Our preliminary analyses suggest that the spatial interactions of attention maps are close to dense interactions rather than sparse ones. This is a curious phenomenon, as dense attention maps are harder for the model to learn due to steeper softmax gradients around them. We interpret this as a strong preference for ViT models to include dense interaction. We thus manually insert the uniform attention to each layer of ViT models to supply the much needed dense interactions. We call this method Context Broadcasting, CB. We observe that the inclusion of CB reduces the degree of density in the original attention maps and increases both the capacity and generalizability of the ViT models. CB incurs negligible costs: 1 line in your model code, no additional parameters, and minimal extra operations.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 57 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2022.

Builds on

57 of 71 references.

References · 57

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  5. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  6. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  7. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  8. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
  9. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  10. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  11. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  12. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
38 more
  1. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  2. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
  3. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
  4. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
  5. 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,239
  6. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
  7. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  8. 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,498
  9. 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,489
  10. 2016Pyramid Scene Parsing Networkcited by 2,472
  11. 2017Non-local Neural Networkscited by 2,290
  12. 2021ViViT: A Video Vision Transformercited by 1,610
  13. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  14. 2017Deformable Convolutional Networkscited by 1,481
  15. 2021MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Visioncited by 1,441
  16. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
  17. 2018Unified Perceptual Parsing for Scene Understandingcited by 1,265
  18. 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,235
  19. 2021ViLT: Vision-and-Language Transformer Without Convolution or Region Supervisioncited by 1,224
  20. 2015Multi-Scale Context Aggregation by Dilated Convolutionscited by 1,128
  21. 2016Semantic Understanding of Scenes through the ADE20K Datasetcited by 1,063
  22. 2016Deep Networks with Stochastic Depthcited by 973
  23. 2017Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Eracited by 916
  24. 2021Segmenter: Transformer for Semantic Segmentationcited by 855
  25. 2018CCNet: Criss-Cross Attention for Semantic Segmentationcited by 717
  26. 2021Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 671
  27. 2017Understanding the Effective Receptive Field in Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 549
  28. 2019Stand-Alone Self-Attention in Vision Modelscited by 542
  29. 2021Intriguing Properties of Vision Transformerscited by 446
  30. 2020TAPAS: Weakly Supervised Table Parsing via Pre-trainingcited by 432
  31. 2021VATT: Transformers for Multimodal Self-Supervised Learning from Raw Video, Audio and Textcited by 427
  32. 2020End-to-End Human Pose and Mesh Reconstruction with Transformerscited by 417
  33. 2021Multi-Modal Fusion Transformer for End-to-End Autonomous Drivingcited by 372
  34. 2021Rethinking Spatial Dimensions of Vision Transformerscited by 361
  35. 2021ResMLP: Feedforward networks for image classification with data-efficient trainingcited by 338
  36. 2021XCiT: Cross-Covariance Image Transformerscited by 335
  37. 2020Are we done with ImageNet?cited by 329
  38. 2022How Do Vision Transformers Work?cited by 305

50 most cited of 57 All 57 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 7; 2025: 4; 2026: 4.

16 papers.

Sort:

By area: