mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Data-Limited Tissue Segmentation using Inpainting-Based Self-Supervised Learning

arXiv 2210.07936 ↗First posted 14 Oct 2022eess.IV cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Although supervised learning has enabled high performance for image segmentation, it requires a large amount of labeled training data, which can be difficult to obtain in the medical imaging field. Self-supervised learning (SSL) methods involving pretext tasks have shown promise in overcoming this requirement by first pretraining models using unlabeled data. In this work, we evaluate the efficacy of two SSL methods (inpainting-based pretext tasks of context prediction and context restoration) for CT and MRI image segmentation in label-limited scenarios, and investigate the effect of implementation design choices for SSL on downstream segmentation performance. We demonstrate that optimally trained and easy-to-implement inpainting-based SSL segmentation models can outperform classically supervised methods for MRI and CT tissue segmentation in label-limited scenarios, for both clinically-relevant metrics and the traditional Dice score.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2022.

Builds on

18 of 37 references.

References · 18

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  3. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
  4. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
  5. 2018Group Normalizationcited by 1,514
  6. 2016Context Encoders: Feature Learning by Inpaintingcited by 1,424
  7. 2016Unsupervised Learning of Visual Representations by Solving Jigsaw Puzzlescited by 1,379
  8. 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 722
  9. 2019Self-supervised Visual Feature Learning with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 656
  10. 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 560
  11. 2020Contrastive learning of global and local features for medical image segmentation with limited annotationscited by 309
  12. 2020CHAOS Challenge -- Combined (CT-MR) Healthy Abdominal Organ Segmentationcited by 307
6 more
  1. 2019Scaling and Benchmarking Self-Supervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 201
  2. 2020How Useful is Self-Supervised Pretraining for Visual Tasks?cited by 80
  3. 2022SKM-TEA: A Dataset for Accelerated MRI Reconstruction with Dense Image Labels for Quantitative Clinical Evaluationcited by 42
  4. 2019Improving Robustness of Deep Learning Based Knee MRI Segmentation: Mixup and Adversarial Domain Adaptationcited by 27
  5. 2020The International Workshop on Osteoarthritis Imaging Knee MRI Segmentation Challenge: A Multi-Institute Evaluation and Analysis Framework on a Standardized Datasetcited by 9
  6. 2019Technical Considerations for Semantic Segmentation in MRI using Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.