mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Comparison of different automatic solutions for resection cavity segmentation in postoperative MRI volumes including longitudinal acquisitions

arXiv 2210.07806 ↗First posted 14 Oct 2022cs.CV cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this work, we compare five deep learning solutions to automatically segment the resection cavity in postoperative MRI. The proposed methods are based on the same 3D U-Net architecture. We use a dataset of postoperative MRI volumes, each including four MRI sequences and the ground truth of the corresponding resection cavity. Four solutions are trained with a different MRI sequence. Besides, a method designed with all the available sequences is also presented. Our experiments show that the method trained only with the T1 weighted contrast-enhanced MRI sequence achieves the best results, with a median DICE index of 0.81.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2022.

Builds on

2 of 10 references.

References · 2

  1. 20163D U-Net: Learning Dense Volumetric Segmentation from Sparse Annotationcited by 1,476
  2. 2017Tversky loss function for image segmentation using 3D fully convolutional deep networkscited by 228

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.