mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Caption supervision enables robust learners

arXiv 2210.07396 ↗First posted 13 Oct 2022cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Vision language (VL) models like CLIP are robust to natural distribution shifts, in part because CLIP learns on unstructured data using a technique called caption supervision; the model inteprets image-linked texts as ground-truth labels. In a carefully controlled comparison study, we show that caption-supervised CNNs trained on a standard cross-entropy loss (with image labels assigned by scanning captions for class names) can exhibit greater distributional robustness than VL models trained on the same data. To facilitate future experiments with high-accuracy caption-supervised models, we introduce CaptionNet (https://github.com/penfever/CaptionNet/), which includes a class-balanced, fully supervised dataset with over 50,000 new human-labeled ImageNet-compliant samples which includes web-scraped captions. In a series of experiments on CaptionNet, we show how the choice of loss function, data filtration and supervision strategy enable robust computer vision. We also provide the codebase necessary to reproduce our experiments at VL Hub (https://github.com/penfever/vlhub/).

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2022.

Builds on

25 of 47 references.

References · 25

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,310
  3. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  4. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  5. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
  6. 2021LAION-400M: Open Dataset of CLIP-Filtered 400 Million Image-Text Pairscited by 1,544
  7. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  8. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
  9. 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,366
  10. 2022CoCa: Contrastive Captioners are Image-Text Foundation Modelscited by 1,265
  11. 2021Conceptual 12M: Pushing Web-Scale Image-Text Pre-Training To Recognize Long-Tail Visual Conceptscited by 1,209
  12. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
13 more
  1. 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 785
  2. 2021LiT: Zero-Shot Transfer with Locked-image text Tuningcited by 572
  3. 2018The Open Images Dataset V4: Unified image classification, object detection, and visual relationship detection at scalecited by 542
  4. 2020Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image Classificationcited by 452
  5. 2021Accuracy on the Line: On the Strong Correlation Between Out-of-Distribution and In-Distribution Generalizationcited by 248
  6. 2015YFCC100M: The New Data in Multimedia Researchcited by 234
  7. 2019Connecting Vision and Language with Localized Narrativescited by 225
  8. 2021Combined Scaling for Zero-shot Transfer Learningcited by 182
  9. 2022Data Determines Distributional Robustness in Contrastive Language Image Pre-training (CLIP)cited by 137
  10. 2022Quality Not Quantity: On the Interaction between Dataset Design and Robustness of CLIPcited by 97
  11. 2022Is a Caption Worth a Thousand Images? A Controlled Study for Representation Learningcited by 39
  12. 2020Resolving Class Imbalance in Object Detection with Weighted Cross Entropy Lossescited by 21
  13. 2022A Meta-Analysis of Distributionally-Robust Modelscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

4 papers.