mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

No Dimension-Free Deterministic Algorithm Computes Approximate Stationarities of Lipschitzians

arXiv 2210.06907 ↗First posted 13 Oct 2022math.OCcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider the computation of an approximately stationary point for a Lipschitz and semialgebraic function f with a local oracle. If f is smooth, simple deterministic methods have dimension-free finite oracle complexities. For the general Lipschitz setting, only recently, Zhang et al. [47] introduced a randomized algorithm that computes Goldstein's approximate stationarity [25] to arbitrary precision with a dimension-free polynomial oracle complexity. In this paper, we show that no deterministic algorithm can do the same. Even without the dimension-free requirement, we show that any finite time guaranteed deterministic method cannot be general zero-respecting, which rules out most of the oracle-based methods in smooth optimization and any trivial derandomization of Zhang et al. [47]. Our results reveal a fundamental hurdle of nonconvex nonsmooth problems in the modern large-scale setting and their infinite-dimensional extension.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 6; 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

15 papers.

Sort: