mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Bug Analysis in Jupyter Notebook Projects: An Empirical Study

arXiv 2210.06893 ↗First posted 13 Oct 2022cs.SEcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Computational notebooks, such as Jupyter, have been widely adopted by data scientists to write code for analyzing and visualizing data. Despite their growing adoption and popularity, there has been no thorough study to understand Jupyter development challenges from the practitioners' point of view. This paper presents a systematic study of bugs and challenges that Jupyter practitioners face through a large-scale empirical investigation. We mined 14,740 commits from 105 GitHub open-source projects with Jupyter notebook code. Next, we analyzed 30,416 Stack Overflow posts which gave us insights into bugs that practitioners face when developing Jupyter notebook projects. Finally, we conducted nineteen interviews with data scientists to uncover more details about Jupyter bugs and to gain insights into Jupyter developers' challenges. We propose a bug taxonomy for Jupyter projects based on our results. We also highlight bug categories, their root causes, and the challenges that Jupyter practitioners face.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 3.

5 papers.