mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The COVID That Wasn't: Counterfactual Journalism Using GPT

arXiv 2210.06644 ↗First posted 13 Oct 2022cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we explore the use of large language models to assess human interpretations of real world events. To do so, we use a language model trained prior to 2020 to artificially generate news articles concerning COVID-19 given the headlines of actual articles written during the pandemic. We then compare stylistic qualities of our artificially generated corpus with a news corpus, in this case 5,082 articles produced by CBC News between January 23 and May 5, 2020. We find our artificially generated articles exhibits a considerably more negative attitude towards COVID and a significantly lower reliance on geopolitical framing. Our methods and results hold importance for researchers seeking to simulate large scale cultural processes via recent breakthroughs in text generation.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2022.

Builds on

4 of 42 references.

References · 4

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2022A Systematic Evaluation of Large Language Models of Codecited by 360
  3. 2022Generating Training Data with Language Models: Towards Zero-Shot Language Understandingcited by 199
  4. 2020Pandemic Populism: Facebook Pages of Alternative News Media and the Corona Crisis -- A Computational Content Analysiscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2.

4 papers.