Token-Label Alignment for Vision Transformers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Data mixing strategies (e.g., CutMix) have shown the ability to greatly improve the performance of convolutional neural networks (CNNs). They mix two images as inputs for training and assign them with a mixed label with the same ratio. While they are shown effective for vision transformers (ViTs), we identify a token fluctuation phenomenon that has suppressed the potential of data mixing strategies. We empirically observe that the contributions of input tokens fluctuate as forward propagating, which might induce a different mixing ratio in the output tokens. The training target computed by the original data mixing strategy can thus be inaccurate, resulting in less effective training. To address this, we propose a token-label alignment (TL-Align) method to trace the correspondence between transformed tokens and the original tokens to maintain a label for each token. We reuse the computed attention at each layer for efficient token-label alignment, introducing only negligible additional training costs. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method improves the performance of ViTs on image classification, semantic segmentation, objective detection, and transfer learning tasks. Code is available at: https://github.com/Euphoria16/TL-Align.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2022.
Builds on
43 of 59 references.
References · 43
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,414
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
- 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,586
- 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
- 2020Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 3,422
31 more
- 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,884
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2021BEiT: BERT Pre-Training of Image Transformerscited by 2,375
- 2021Pyramid Vision Transformer: A Versatile Backbone for Dense Prediction without Convolutionscited by 1,962
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
- 2021ViViT: A Video Vision Transformercited by 1,620
- 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,515
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
- 2021MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Visioncited by 1,446
- 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,408
- 2020Rethinking Semantic Segmentation from a Sequence-to-Sequence Perspective with Transformerscited by 1,369
- 2017Cascade R-CNN: Delving into High Quality Object Detectioncited by 1,276
- 2021Per-Pixel Classification is Not All You Need for Semantic Segmentationcited by 1,152
- 2021Video Swin Transformercited by 1,091
- 2016Semantic Understanding of Scenes through the ADE20K Datasetcited by 1,069
- 2020Pre-Trained Image Processing Transformercited by 893
- 2021Segmenter: Transformer for Semantic Segmentationcited by 855
- 2021Twins: Revisiting the Design of Spatial Attention in Vision Transformerscited by 565
- 2022DeiT III: Revenge of the ViTcited by 419
- 2021ResMLP: Feedforward networks for image classification with data-efficient trainingcited by 339
- 2020Puzzle Mix: Exploiting Saliency and Local Statistics for Optimal Mixupcited by 261
- 2022Visual Attention Networkcited by 210
- 2020SaliencyMix: A Saliency Guided Data Augmentation Strategy for Better Regularizationcited by 149
- 2021All Tokens Matter: Token Labeling for Training Better Vision Transformerscited by 144
- 2021TransMix: Attend to Mix for Vision Transformerscited by 79
- 2020ResizeMix: Mixing Data with Preserved Object Information and True Labelscited by 69
- 2017Not All Pixels Are Equal: Difficulty-aware Semantic Segmentation via Deep Layer Cascadecited by 53
- 2022TokenMix: Rethinking Image Mixing for Data Augmentation in Vision Transformerscited by 48
- 2022The Principle of Diversity: Training Stronger Vision Transformers Calls for Reducing All Levels of Redundancycited by 35
- 2021AlignMixup: Improving Representations By Interpolating Aligned Featurescited by 33
- 2022RecursiveMix: Mixed Learning with Historycited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 3.
5 papers.
- 2022A Survey of Mix-based Data Augmentation: Taxonomy, Methods, Applications, and Explainabilitycited by 31
- 2024A Survey on Mixup Augmentations and Beyondcited by 20
- 2026S2-FracMix: Label-Preserving Self-Saliency Mixup Augmentationcited by 2
- 2026InstructMixup: Instruction-Guided Salient Patch Editing for Robust Data Augmentationcited by 1
- 2026Uncertainty-DTW for Sequences and Visual Tokenscited by 0
- 2026InstructMixup: Instruction-Guided Salient Patch Editing for Robust Data Augmentation21 Jul 2026
- 2026S2-FracMix: Label-Preserving Self-Saliency Mixup Augmentation24 Jun 2026
- 2026Uncertainty-DTW for Sequences and Visual Tokens24 May 2026
- 2024A Survey on Mixup Augmentations and Beyond8 Sep 2024
- 2022A Survey of Mix-based Data Augmentation: Taxonomy, Methods, Applications, and Explainability21 Dec 2022