Improving information retention in large scale online continual learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Given a stream of data sampled from non-stationary distributions, online continual learning (OCL) aims to adapt efficiently to new data while retaining existing knowledge. The typical approach to address information retention (the ability to retain previous knowledge) is keeping a replay buffer of a fixed size and computing gradients using a mixture of new data and the replay buffer. Surprisingly, the recent work (Cai et al., 2021) suggests that information retention remains a problem in large scale OCL even when the replay buffer is unlimited, i.e., the gradients are computed using all past data. This paper focuses on this peculiarity to understand and address information retention. To pinpoint the source of this problem, we theoretically show that, given limited computation budgets at each time step, even without strict storage limit, naively applying SGD with constant or constantly decreasing learning rates fails to optimize information retention in the long term. We propose using a moving average family of methods to improve optimization for non-stationary objectives. Specifically, we design an adaptive moving average (AMA) optimizer and a moving-average-based learning rate schedule (MALR). We demonstrate the effectiveness of AMA+MALR on large-scale benchmarks, including Continual Localization (CLOC), Google Landmarks, and ImageNet. Code will be released upon publication.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2022.
Builds on
22 of 35 references.
References · 22
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,465
- 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,194
- 2017Memory Aware Synapses: Learning what (not) to forgetcited by 1,094
- 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 793
- 2013Stochastic First- and Zeroth-order Methods for Nonconvex Stochastic Programmingcited by 716
- 2019Gradient based sample selection for online continual learningcited by 568
- 2019A Simple Baseline for Bayesian Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 555
10 more
- 2017Mean teachers are better role models: Weight-averaged consistency targets improve semi-supervised deep learning resultscited by 470
- 2019Online Continual Learning with Maximally Interfered Retrievalcited by 376
- 2017Population Based Training of Neural Networkscited by 351
- 2020Google Landmarks Dataset v2 -- A Large-Scale Benchmark for Instance-Level Recognition and Retrievalcited by 305
- 2015YFCC100M: The New Data in Multimedia Researchcited by 234
- 2013Non-stationary Stochastic Optimizationcited by 173
- 2022The CLEAR Benchmark: Continual LEArning on Real-World Imagerycited by 92
- 2021Online Continual Learning with Natural Distribution Shifts: An Empirical Study with Visual Datacited by 67
- 2016A Variational Analysis of Stochastic Gradient Algorithmscited by 56
- 2020Drinking from a Firehose: Continual Learning with Web-scale Natural Languagecited by 24
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.