mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Detecting Propagators of Disinformation on Twitter Using Quantitative Discursive Analysis

arXiv 2210.05760 ↗First posted 11 Oct 2022cs.SI cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Efforts by foreign actors to influence public opinion have gained considerable attention because of their potential to impact democratic elections. Thus, the ability to identify and counter sources of disinformation is increasingly becoming a top priority for government entities in order to protect the integrity of democratic processes. This study presents a method of identifying Russian disinformation bots on Twitter using centering resonance analysis and Clauset-Newman-Moore community detection. The data reflect a significant degree of discursive dissimilarity between known Russian disinformation bots and a control set of Twitter users during the timeframe of the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. The data also demonstrate statistically significant classification capabilities (MCC = 0.9070) based on community clustering. The prediction algorithm is very effective at identifying true positives (bots), but is not able to resolve true negatives (non-bots) because of the lack of discursive similarity between control users. This leads to a highly sensitive means of identifying propagators of disinformation with a high degree of discursive similarity on Twitter, with implications for limiting the spread of disinformation that could impact democratic processes.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2022.

Builds on

2 of 12 references.

References · 2

  1. 2020Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlationcited by 420
  2. 2019Arming the public with artificial intelligence to counter social botscited by 24

Built on by

Not cited yet.