mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Fully-Connected Layers for Low-Data Regimes

arXiv 2210.05657 ↗First posted 11 Oct 2022cs.CV cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Convolutional neural networks were the standard for solving many computer vision tasks until recently, when Transformers of MLP-based architectures have started to show competitive performance. These architectures typically have a vast number of weights and need to be trained on massive datasets; hence, they are not suitable for their use in low-data regimes. In this work, we propose a simple yet effective framework to improve generalization from small amounts of data. We augment modern CNNs with fully-connected (FC) layers and show the massive impact this architectural change has in low-data regimes. We further present an online joint knowledge-distillation method to utilize the extra FC layers at train time but avoid them during test time. This allows us to improve the generalization of a CNN-based model without any increase in the number of weights at test time. We perform classification experiments for a large range of network backbones and several standard datasets on supervised learning and active learning. Our experiments significantly outperform the networks without fully-connected layers, reaching a relative improvement of up to 16% validation accuracy in the supervised setting without adding any extra parameters during inference.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2022.

Builds on

25 of 39 references.

References · 25

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  5. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  6. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  7. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  8. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  9. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
  10. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
  11. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
  12. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
13 more
  1. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  2. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,853
  3. 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
  4. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  5. 2020Knowledge Distillation: A Surveycited by 1,578
  6. 2021MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Visioncited by 1,441
  7. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
  8. 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
  9. 2017Deep Mutual Learningcited by 621
  10. 2019Learning Loss for Active Learningcited by 335
  11. 2022Patches Are All You Need?cited by 201
  12. 2018Large scale distributed neural network training through online distillationcited by 144
  13. 2021RepMLPNet: Hierarchical Vision MLP with Re-parameterized Localitycited by 32

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

6 papers.