Intrinsic Dimension for Large-Scale Geometric Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The concept of dimension is essential to grasp the complexity of data. A naive approach to determine the dimension of a dataset is based on the number of attributes. More sophisticated methods derive a notion of intrinsic dimension (ID) that employs more complex feature functions, e.g., distances between data points. Yet, many of these approaches are based on empirical observations, cannot cope with the geometric character of contemporary datasets, and do lack an axiomatic foundation. A different approach was proposed by V. Pestov, who links the intrinsic dimension axiomatically to the mathematical concentration of measure phenomenon. First methods to compute this and related notions for ID were computationally intractable for large-scale real-world datasets. In the present work, we derive a computationally feasible method for determining said axiomatic ID functions. Moreover, we demonstrate how the geometric properties of complex data are accounted for in our modeling. In particular, we propose a principle way to incorporate neighborhood information, as in graph data, into the ID. This allows for new insights into common graph learning procedures, which we illustrate by experiments on the Open Graph Benchmark.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2022.
Builds on
20 of 38 references.
References · 20
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
- 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,434
- 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,163
- 2016Revisiting Semi-Supervised Learning with Graph Embeddingscited by 976
- 2018Measuring the Intrinsic Dimension of Objective Landscapescited by 370
- 2021OGB-LSC: A Large-Scale Challenge for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 329
- 2021The Intrinsic Dimension of Images and Its Impact on Learningcited by 315
- 2020SIGN: Scalable Inception Graph Neural Networkscited by 284
- 2018Characterizing Adversarial Subspaces Using Local Intrinsic Dimensionalitycited by 282
- 2019Intrinsic dimension of data representations in deep neural networkscited by 282
8 more
- 2018Estimating the intrinsic dimension of datasets by a minimal neighborhood informationcited by 250
- 2018Dimensionality-Driven Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 173
- 2022Graph Attention Multi-Layer Perceptroncited by 83
- 2021Scalable and Adaptive Graph Neural Networks with Self-Label-Enhanced trainingcited by 54
- 2020Can Shallow Neural Networks Beat the Curse of Dimensionality? A mean field training perspectivecited by 22
- 2019Geometry-Aware Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Intrinsic Dimensioncited by 15
- 2018Intrinsic Dimension of Geometric Data Setscited by 7
- 2020Local intrinsic dimensionality estimators based on concentration of measurecited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2.
4 papers.
- 2023Selecting Features by their Resilience to the Curse of Dimensionalitycited by 1
- 2023Towards Ordinal Data Sciencecited by 1
- 2024What is the textitintrinsic dimension of your binary data? -- and how to compute it quicklycited by 1
- 2024Reproducibility and Geometric Intrinsic Dimensionality: An Investigation on Graph Neural Network Researchcited by 0
- 2024What is the textitintrinsic dimension of your binary data? -- and how to compute it quickly9 Apr 2024
- 2024Reproducibility and Geometric Intrinsic Dimensionality: An Investigation on Graph Neural Network Research13 Mar 2024
- 2023Towards Ordinal Data Science13 Jul 2023
- 2023Selecting Features by their Resilience to the Curse of Dimensionality5 Apr 2023