A Differentiable Distance Approximation for Fairer Image Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Naively trained AI models can be heavily biased. This can be particularly problematic when the biases involve legally or morally protected attributes such as ethnic background, age or gender. Existing solutions to this problem come at the cost of extra computation, unstable adversarial optimisation or have losses on the feature space structure that are disconnected from fairness measures and only loosely generalise to fairness. In this work we propose a differentiable approximation of the variance of demographics, a metric that can be used to measure the bias, or unfairness, in an AI model. Our approximation can be optimised alongside the regular training objective which eliminates the need for any extra models during training and directly improves the fairness of the regularised models. We demonstrate that our approach improves the fairness of AI models in varied task and dataset scenarios, whilst still maintaining a high level of classification accuracy. Code is available at https://bitbucket.org/nelliottrosa/base_fairness.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2022.
Builds on
25 of 38 references.
References · 25
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
- 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,833
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
- 2021ResNet strikes back: An improved training procedure in timmcited by 365
- 2019Towards Fairness in Visual Recognition: Effective Strategies for Bias Mitigationcited by 252
- 2019Flexibly Fair Representation Learning by Disentanglementcited by 196
- 2016Fairness in Learning: Classic and Contextual Banditscited by 167
- 2017Data Decisions and Theoretical Implications when Adversarially Learning Fair Representationscited by 165
- 2018FairGAN: Fairness-aware Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 164
13 more
- 2019Mitigate Bias in Face Recognition using Skewness-Aware Reinforcement Learningcited by 145
- 2020Fair Attribute Classification through Latent Space De-biasingcited by 125
- 2017Stabilizing Training of Generative Adversarial Networks through Regularizationcited by 118
- 2021DECAF: Generating Fair Synthetic Data Using Causally-Aware Generative Networkscited by 109
- 2020FairBatch: Batch Selection for Model Fairnesscited by 99
- 2022Fair Contrastive Learning for Facial Attribute Classificationcited by 71
- 2020Mitigating Face Recognition Bias via Group Adaptive Classifiercited by 67
- 2021Fair Feature Distillation for Visual Recognitioncited by 59
- 2022Leveling Down in Computer Vision: Pareto Inefficiencies in Fair Deep Classifierscited by 53
- 2021Consistent Instance False Positive Improves Fairness in Face Recognitioncited by 40
- 2021PASS: Protected Attribute Suppression System for Mitigating Bias in Face Recognitioncited by 38
- 2021Adaptive Sampling for Minimax Fair Classificationcited by 24
- 2022Optimising Equal Opportunity Fairness in Model Trainingcited by 22
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.