mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Trustworthiness of Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Predictions via Simulation-based Synthetic Data Augmentation and Multitask Learning

arXiv 2210.03762 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2022physics.app-ph cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider quantitative analyses of spectral data using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. We address the small size of training data available, and the validation of the predictions during inference on unknown data. For the purpose, we build robust calibration models using deep convolutional multitask learning architectures to predict the concentration of the analyte, alongside additional spectral information as auxiliary outputs. These secondary predictions can be used to validate the trustworthiness of the model by taking advantage of the mutual dependencies of the parameters of the multitask neural networks. Due to the experimental lack of training samples, we introduce a simulation-based data augmentation process to synthesise an arbitrary number of spectra, statistically representative of the experimental data. Given the nature of the deep learning model, no dimensionality reduction or data selection processes are required. The procedure is an end-to-end pipeline including the process of synthetic data augmentation, the construction of a suitable robust, homoscedastic, deep learning model, and the validation of its predictions. In the article, we compare the performance of the multitask model with traditional univariate and multivariate analyses, to highlight the separate contributions of each element introduced in the process.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 89 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2022.

Builds on

25 of 89 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  4. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  5. 2015Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamicscited by 7,058
  6. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  7. 2022Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understandingcited by 6,355
  8. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  9. 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,288
  10. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
  11. 2022A Generalist Agentcited by 808
  12. 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 672
13 more
  1. 2019Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Machine Learningcited by 521
  2. 2020Multi-Task Learning with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 375
  3. 2017High-dimensional dynamics of generalization error in neural networkscited by 241
  4. 2021How Faithful is your Synthetic Data? Sample-level Metrics for Evaluating and Auditing Generative Modelscited by 196
  5. 2018The jamming transition as a paradigm to understand the loss landscape of deep neural networkscited by 62
  6. 2015How much data is needed to train a medical image deep learning system to achieve necessary high accuracy?cited by 45
  7. 2015Do We Need More Training Data?cited by 27
  8. 2020Machine learning for complete intersection Calabi-Yau manifolds: a methodological studycited by 17
  9. 2020Inception Neural Network for Complete Intersection Calabi-Yau 3-foldscited by 14
  10. 2022A Data-Augmentation Is Worth A Thousand Samples: Exact Quantification From Analytical Augmented Sample Momentscited by 14
  11. 2020How many images do I need? Understanding how sample size per class affects deep learning model performance metrics for balanced designs in autonomous wildlife monitoringcited by 11
  12. 2021Deep multi-task mining Calabi-Yau four-foldscited by 11
  13. 2021HyperPCA: a Powerful Tool to Extract Elemental Maps from Noisy Data Obtained in LIBS Mapping of Materialscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.