mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Transferring dense object detection models to event-based data

arXiv 2210.02607 ↗First posted 5 Oct 2022cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Event-based image representations are fundamentally different to traditional dense images. This poses a challenge to apply current state-of-the-art models for object detection as they are designed for dense images. In this work we evaluate the YOLO object detection model on event data. To this end we replace dense-convolution layers by either sparse convolutions or asynchronous sparse convolutions which enables direct processing of event-based images and compare the performance and runtime to feeding event-histograms into dense-convolutions. Here, hyper-parameters are shared across all variants to isolate the effect sparse-representation has on detection performance. At this, we show that current sparse-convolution implementations cannot translate their theoretical lower computation requirements into an improved runtime.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2022.

Builds on

7 of 10 references.

References · 7

  1. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,852
  2. 2019Event-based Vision: A Surveycited by 1,016
  3. 20173D Semantic Segmentation with Submanifold Sparse Convolutional Networkscited by 748
  4. 2019Events-to-Video: Bringing Modern Computer Vision to Event Camerascited by 193
  5. 2019Video to Events: Recycling Video Datasets for Event Camerascited by 165
  6. 2020Event-based Asynchronous Sparse Convolutional Networkscited by 104
  7. 2018Asynchronous Convolutional Networks for Object Detection in Neuromorphic Camerascited by 57

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.

2 papers.