Spanning Trees and Redistricting: New Methods for Sampling and Validation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deciding whether a political districting plan was distorted by a hidden agenda, or whether it dilutes the voting power of some group, requires a neutral baseline for comparison. Remarkably, all nine U.S. Supreme Court justices have now signed on to decisions that find that computational methods can provide key evidence. Today, the leading approaches for benchmarking districting plans are based on the use of spanning trees for sampling graph partitions. We present a new *reversible recombination* algorithm and rigorously prove its fundamental properties. Furthermore, we argue for a canonical sampling distribution called the *spanning tree distribution* that is well adapted to redistricting and provides a principled foundation for comparing and validating methods. Together with a highly efficient (and open-source) implementation that can generate and handle large datasets, this work provides the most powerful null model to date for the gerrymandering problem, meeting an urgent democratic challenge with sound scientific methodology.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025Revisiting Compactness for District Planscited by 0
- 2025Revisiting Compactness for District Plans4 Jan 2025