mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Data Budgeting for Machine Learning

arXiv 2210.00987 ↗First posted 3 Oct 2022cs.LG cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data is the fuel powering AI and creates tremendous value for many domains. However, collecting datasets for AI is a time-consuming, expensive, and complicated endeavor. For practitioners, data investment remains to be a leap of faith in practice. In this work, we study the data budgeting problem and formulate it as two sub-problems: predicting (1) what is the saturating performance if given enough data, and (2) how many data points are needed to reach near the saturating performance. Different from traditional dataset-independent methods like PowerLaw, we proposed a learning method to solve data budgeting problems. To support and systematically evaluate the learning-based method for data budgeting, we curate a large collection of 383 tabular ML datasets, along with their data vs performance curves. Our empirical evaluation shows that it is possible to perform data budgeting given a small pilot study dataset with as few as 50 data points.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2022.

Builds on

7 of 14 references.

References · 7

  1. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  2. 2017Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Eracited by 916
  3. 2014OpenML: networked science in machine learningcited by 523
  4. 2020AutoGluon-Tabular: Robust and Accurate AutoML for Structured Datacited by 368
  5. 2019A Constructive Prediction of the Generalization Error Across Scalescited by 202
  6. 2018Estimating Learnability in the Sublinear Data Regimecited by 10
  7. 2017Bayes, not Na"ive: Security Bounds on Website Fingerprinting Defensescited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.

2 papers.