mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Analysis of (sub-)Riemannian PDE-G-CNNs

arXiv 2210.00935 ↗First posted 3 Oct 2022cs.LG cs.CV math.DGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Group equivariant convolutional neural networks (G-CNNs) have been successfully applied in geometric deep learning. Typically, G-CNNs have the advantage over CNNs that they do not waste network capacity on training symmetries that should have been hard-coded in the network. The recently introduced framework of PDE-based G-CNNs (PDE-G-CNNs) generalises G-CNNs. PDE-G-CNNs have the core advantages that they simultaneously 1) reduce network complexity, 2) increase classification performance, and 3) provide geometric interpretability. Their implementations primarily consist of linear and morphological convolutions with kernels. In this paper we show that the previously suggested approximative morphological kernels do not always accurately approximate the exact kernels accurately. More specifically, depending on the spatial anisotropy of the Riemannian metric, we argue that one must resort to sub-Riemannian approximations. We solve this problem by providing a new approximative kernel that works regardless of the anisotropy. We provide new theorems with better error estimates of the approximative kernels, and prove that they all carry the same reflectional symmetries as the exact ones. We test the effectiveness of multiple approximative kernels within the PDE-G-CNN framework on two datasets, and observe an improvement with the new approximative kernels. We report that the PDE-G-CNNs again allow for a considerable reduction of network complexity while having comparable or better performance than G-CNNs and CNNs on the two datasets. Moreover, PDE-G-CNNs have the advantage of better geometric interpretability over G-CNNs, as the morphological kernels are related to association fields from neurogeometry.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2022.

Builds on

27 of 64 references.

References · 27

  1. 2017A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysiscited by 1,182
  2. 2016Group Equivariant Convolutional Networkscited by 1,154
  3. 2021Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs, Geodesics, and Gaugescited by 1,131
  4. 2021E(n) Equivariant Graph Neural Networkscited by 951
  5. 2019General E(2)-Equivariant Steerable CNNscited by 441
  6. 2018On the Generalization of Equivariance and Convolution in Neural Networks to the Action of Compact Groupscited by 296
  7. 2016Harmonic Networks: Deep Translation and Rotation Equivariancecited by 293
  8. 2019Gauge Equivariant Convolutional Networks and the Icosahedral CNNcited by 262
  9. 2020Generalizing Convolutional Neural Networks for Equivariance to Lie Groups on Arbitrary Continuous Datacited by 248
  10. 2017Learning SO(3) Equivariant Representations with Spherical CNNscited by 244
  11. 2018A General Theory of Equivariant CNNs on Homogeneous Spacescited by 223
  12. 2017Learning Steerable Filters for Rotation Equivariant CNNscited by 193
15 more
  1. 2020Lorentz Group Equivariant Neural Network for Particle Physicscited by 120
  2. 2019Deep Scale-spaces: Equivariance Over Scalecited by 113
  3. 2019B-Spline CNNs on Lie Groupscited by 97
  4. 2016Exploiting Cyclic Symmetry in Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 91
  5. 2018Roto-Translation Covariant Convolutional Networks for Medical Image Analysiscited by 91
  6. 2015Rotation-invariant convolutional neural networks for galaxy morphology predictioncited by 83
  7. 2021Coordinate Independent Convolutional Networks -- Isometry and Gauge Equivariant Convolutions on Riemannian Manifoldscited by 72
  8. 2018CubeNet: Equivariance to 3D Rotation and Translationcited by 59
  9. 2014Deep Roto-Translation Scattering for Object Classificationcited by 49
  10. 20183D G-CNNs for Pulmonary Nodule Detectioncited by 36
  11. 2020PDE-based Group Equivariant Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 28
  12. 2017A geometric model of multi-scale orientation preference maps via Gabor functionscited by 4
  13. 2020Geometrical Optical Illusion via Sub-Riemannian Geodesics in the Roto-Translation Groupcited by 4
  14. 2020A cortical-inspired sub-Riemannian model for Poggendorff-type visual illusionscited by 3
  15. 2016Template Matching via Densities on the Roto-Translation Groupcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

8 papers.