mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Using Argumentation Schemes to Model Legal Reasoning

arXiv 2210.00315 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2022cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present argumentation schemes to model reasoning with legal cases. We provide schemes for each of the three stages that take place after the facts are established: factor ascription, issue resolution and outcome determination. The schemes are illustrated with examples from a specific legal domain, US Trade Secrets law, and the wider applicability of these schemes is discussed.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2022.

Builds on

2 of 42 references.

References · 2

  1. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,206
  2. 2021Using Issues to Explain Legal Decisionscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.